3015e
VS
Core i3-3250T

3015e vs Core i3-3250T

AMD

3015e

2 Cores4 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2020
VS
Intel

Core i3-3250T

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The 3015e is positioned at rank 416 and the Core i3-3250T is on rank 811, so the 3015e offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar 3015e

#125
Core i7-13700H
MSRP: $502|Avg: N/A
99%
#404
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
560%
#405
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
552%
#406
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
507%
#407
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
505%
#408
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
500%
#410
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
483%
#411
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
463%
#412
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
462%
#413
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
450%
#416
3015e
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#421
Core i5-9400H
MSRP: $182|Avg: N/A
99%
#426
Celeron 2981U
MSRP: $137|Avg: N/A
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-3250T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
16235%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
15341%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
11139%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3356%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2658%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2325%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1332%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1314%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1197%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1197%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1183%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1151%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1135%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1131%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1120%
#811
Core i3-3250T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $15
100%
#812
Core i5-5575R
MSRP: $265|Avg: $50
100%
#814
Core i3-3210
MSRP: $117|Avg: $25
99%
#815
Celeron G3900E
MSRP: $107|Avg: $35
99%
#816
Athlon II X3 435
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
98%
#817
Core i7-6822EQ
MSRP: $294|Avg: $190
98%
#818
Athlon II X4 645
MSRP: $126|Avg: $20
98%
#819
Core i5-7400
MSRP: $294|Avg: $70
97%
#820
Pentium E5800
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
97%
#821
Core i7-6820EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $344
97%
#822
A6-9500
MSRP: $101|Avg: $25
97%
#823
Pentium G2120T
MSRP: $87|Avg: $10
97%
#824
Athlon II X2 270
MSRP: $72|Avg: $15
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The 3015e (2020) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
Insight3015eCore i3-3250T
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Pollock (Zen) (2020) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i3-3250T (2013) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
Insight3015eCore i3-3250T
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of 3015e and Core i3-3250T

AMD

3015e

The 3015e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Pollock (Zen) (2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FT5. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB + 4 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,618 points. Launch price was $50.

Intel

Core i3-3250T

The Core i3-3250T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,650 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the 3015e and Core i3-3250T share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the 3015e versus 3 GHz on the Core i3-3250T — a 26.4% clock advantage for the Core i3-3250T (base: 1.2 GHz vs 3 GHz). The 3015e uses the Pollock (Zen) (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-3250T uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the 3015e scores 2,618 against the Core i3-3250T's 2,650 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i3-3250T. L3 cache: 4 MB on the 3015e vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-3250T.

Feature3015eCore i3-3250T
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.3 GHz
3 GHz+30%
Base Clock
1.2 GHz
3 GHz+150%
L3 Cache
4 MB+33%
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm-36%
22 nm
Architecture
Pollock (Zen) (2020)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
2,618
2,650+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The 3015e uses the FT5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-3250T uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the 3015e versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-3250T — the 3015e supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-3250T supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (3015e) vs 2 (Core i3-3250T). PCIe lanes: 8 (3015e) vs 16 (Core i3-3250T) — the Core i3-3250T offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FT5 (3015e) and H61,B75,H77,Z77 (Core i3-3250T).

Feature3015eCore i3-3250T
Socket
FT5
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
1600+53233%
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
16
32 GB+209715100%
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
16+100%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (3015e) / not specified (Core i3-3250T). Both include integrated graphics Vega 3 (3015e) and Intel HD Graphics 2500 (Core i3-3250T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: 3015e rivals Celeron N4120.

Feature3015eCore i3-3250T
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Vega 3
Intel HD Graphics 2500
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true