3015e vs Core i3-3250T

3015e vs Core i3-3250T Performance Spectrum

3015e

2 / 4

2,618

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-3250T

2 / 4

2,650

+1.2%

Celeron N2810

Pentium Dual Core T2390

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

3015e vs Core i3-3250T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

3015e vs Core i3-3250T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

3015e

2020

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Draws 1W instead of 35W, a 34W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-3250T across 38 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,618 vs 2,650).

Core i3-3250T

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.2% higher average FPS across 38 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $138 MSRP, while 3015e mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌3400% higher power demand at 35W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-3250T better than 3015e?

Yes. Core i3-3250T is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.2% average FPS lead across 38 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-3250T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.2% more average FPS across 38 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-3250T is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-3250T is the better buy right now. Core i3-3250T comes in at an unclear MSRP at $138 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.2% average FPS lead across 38 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (19.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

3015e makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2013) and 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

3015e vs Core i3-3250T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

3015e

The 3015e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Pollock (Zen) (2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FT5. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB + 4 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,618 points. Launch price was $50.

Core i3-3250T

The Core i3-3250T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,650 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the 3015e and Core i3-3250T share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the 3015e versus 3 GHz on the Core i3-3250T — a 26.4% clock advantage for the Core i3-3250T (base: 1.2 GHz vs 3 GHz). The 3015e uses the Pollock (Zen) (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-3250T uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the 3015e scores 2,618 against the Core i3-3250T's 2,650 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i3-3250T. L3 cache: 4 MB on the 3015e vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-3250T.

Feature	3015e	Core i3-3250T
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.3 GHz	3 GHz+30%
Base Clock	1.2 GHz	3 GHz+150%
L3 Cache	4 MB+33%	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Pollock (Zen) (2020)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	2,618	2,650+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The 3015e uses the FT5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-3250T uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 1600 memory speed. The Core i3-3250T supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (3015e) vs 2 (Core i3-3250T). PCIe lanes: 8 (3015e) vs 16 (Core i3-3250T) — the Core i3-3250T offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FT5 (3015e) and H61,B75,H77,Z77 (Core i3-3250T).

Feature	3015e	Core i3-3250T
Socket	FT5	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	1600	DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	32 GB+100%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8	16+100%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (3015e) / not specified (Core i3-3250T). Both include integrated graphics — Vega 3 (3015e) and Intel HD Graphics 2500 (Core i3-3250T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: 3015e rivals Celeron N4120.