3015e
VS
Core i5-3610ME

3015e vs Core i5-3610ME

AMD

3015e

2 Cores4 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2020
VS
Intel

Core i5-3610ME

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The 3015e is positioned at rank 416 and the Core i5-3610ME is on rank 1089, so the 3015e offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar 3015e

#125
Core i7-13700H
MSRP: $502|Avg: N/A
99%
#404
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
560%
#405
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
552%
#406
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
507%
#407
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
505%
#408
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
500%
#410
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
483%
#411
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
463%
#412
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
462%
#413
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
450%
#416
3015e
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#421
Core i5-9400H
MSRP: $182|Avg: N/A
99%
#426
Celeron 2981U
MSRP: $137|Avg: N/A
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-3610ME

#1077
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3053%
#1078
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3008%
#1079
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2762%
#1080
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2749%
#1081
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2724%
#1083
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2631%
#1084
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2522%
#1085
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2518%
#1086
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2451%
#1089
Core i5-3610ME
MSRP: $276|Avg: $22
100%
#1090
Core m3-7Y32
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1091
Celeron B720
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
99%
#1093
Celeron 847
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
99%
#1094
Core i7-2630QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
98%
#1096
Core i7-2635QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
98%
#1097
Celeron 877
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
97%
#1098
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $50
97%
#1099
Core i5-3337U
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
97%
#1100
Core i5-2450M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
96%
#1101
Core i5-7Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
96%
#1102
Core i5-7Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $100
96%
#1104
Pentium 997
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The 3015e (2020) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
Insight3015eCore i5-3610ME
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($22)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Pollock (Zen) (2020) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i5-3610ME (2012) relies on 22 nm technology and **unknown Dual-channel**, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
Insight3015eCore i5-3610ME
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($22)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of 3015e and Core i5-3610ME

AMD

3015e

The 3015e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Pollock (Zen) (2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FT5. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB + 4 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,618 points. Launch price was $50.

Intel

Core i5-3610ME

The Core i5-3610ME is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: G2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 2,652 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the 3015e and Core i5-3610ME share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the 3015e versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-3610ME — a 35.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-3610ME (base: 1.2 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The 3015e uses the Pollock (Zen) (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-3610ME uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the 3015e scores 2,618 against the Core i5-3610ME's 2,652 — a 1.3% lead for the Core i5-3610ME. L3 cache: 4 MB on the 3015e vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-3610ME.

Feature3015eCore i5-3610ME
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.3 GHz
3.3 GHz+43%
Base Clock
1.2 GHz
2.7 GHz+125%
L3 Cache
4 MB+33%
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm-36%
22 nm
Architecture
Pollock (Zen) (2020)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
2,618
2,652+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
585
🧠

Memory & Platform

The 3015e uses the FT5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-3610ME uses G2 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the 3015e versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i5-3610ME — the 3015e supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (3015e) vs 2 (Core i5-3610ME). PCIe lanes: 8 (3015e) vs 16 (Core i5-3610ME) — the Core i5-3610ME offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FT5 (3015e) and HM65,QM77,QM67 (Core i5-3610ME).

Feature3015eCore i5-3610ME
Socket
FT5
G2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
1600+53233%
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
16
16 GB+104857500%
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
16+100%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (3015e) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-3610ME). Both include integrated graphics Vega 3 (3015e) and HD Graphics 4000 (Core i5-3610ME) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-3610ME targets Embedded. Direct competitor: 3015e rivals Celeron N4120; Core i5-3610ME rivals Embedded R-Series.

Feature3015eCore i5-3610ME
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Vega 3
HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Embedded