3015e
VS
Core i5-680

3015e vs Core i5-680

AMD

3015e

2 Cores4 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2020
VS
Intel

Core i5-680

2 Cores4 Thrd73 WWMax: 3.86 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The 3015e is positioned at rank 416 and the Core i5-680 is on rank 1014, so the 3015e offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar 3015e

#125
Core i7-13700H
MSRP: $502|Avg: N/A
99%
#404
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
560%
#405
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
552%
#406
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
507%
#407
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
505%
#408
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
500%
#410
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
483%
#411
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
463%
#412
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
462%
#413
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
450%
#416
3015e
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#421
Core i5-9400H
MSRP: $182|Avg: N/A
99%
#426
Celeron 2981U
MSRP: $137|Avg: N/A
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-680

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
34985%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
33057%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
24002%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
7231%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
5728%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
5011%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2870%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2832%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2579%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2579%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2550%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2481%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2446%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2436%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2414%
#1014
Core i5-680
MSRP: $294|Avg: $10
100%
#1015
Core 2 Duo E4300
MSRP: $113|Avg: $5
100%
#1017
Core 2 Duo E4500
MSRP: $133|Avg: $10
98%
#1019
Core 2 Duo E7600
MSRP: $133|Avg: $50
97%
#1020
Core i7-3970X
MSRP: $990|Avg: $60
97%
#1021
Core 2 Duo E8700
MSRP: $256|Avg: $30
97%
#1022
Core 2 Duo E6550
MSRP: $163|Avg: $20
96%
#1023
Phenom X3 8450
MSRP: $145|Avg: $147
95%
#1024
Core i7-3960X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $60
94%
#1025
Celeron 2.70
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
93%
#1027
A10 PRO-7850B
MSRP: $426|Avg: $140
91%
#1028
Core 2 Quad Q8200
MSRP: $224|Avg: $36
91%
#1029
A12-9800E
MSRP: $426|Avg: $150
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The 3015e (2020) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
Insight3015eCore i5-680
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Pollock (Zen) (2020) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Clarkdale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i5-680 (2010) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
Insight3015eCore i5-680
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of 3015e and Core i5-680

AMD

3015e

The 3015e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Pollock (Zen) (2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FT5. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB + 4 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,618 points. Launch price was $50.

Intel

Core i5-680

The Core i5-680 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 April 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.86 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,620 points. Launch price was $272.

Processing Power

Both the 3015e and Core i5-680 share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the 3015e versus 3.86 GHz on the Core i5-680 — a 50.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-680 (base: 1.2 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The 3015e uses the Pollock (Zen) (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-680 uses Clarkdale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the 3015e scores 2,618 against the Core i5-680's 2,620 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i5-680. L3 cache: 4 MB on the 3015e vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i5-680.

Feature3015eCore i5-680
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.3 GHz
3.86 GHz+68%
Base Clock
1.2 GHz
3.6 GHz+200%
L3 Cache
4 MB
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Pollock (Zen) (2020)
Clarkdale (2010−2011)
PassMark
2,618
2,620
🧠

Memory & Platform

The 3015e uses the FT5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-680 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the 3015e versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i5-680 — the 3015e supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (3015e) vs 2 (Core i5-680). PCIe lanes: 8 (3015e) vs 16 (Core i5-680) — the Core i5-680 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature3015eCore i5-680
Socket
FT5
LGA1156
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
1600+53233%
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16
16 GB+104857500%
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
16+100%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (3015e) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-680). Both include integrated graphics Vega 3 (3015e) and HD Graphics (Core i5-680) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-680 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: 3015e rivals Celeron N4120.

Feature3015eCore i5-680
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Vega 3
HD Graphics
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Desktop