3015e vs Core i7-3687U

3015e vs Core i7-3687U Performance Spectrum

3015e

2 / 4

2,618

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i7-3687U

2 / 4

2,621

+0.1%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

3015e vs Core i7-3687U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

3015e vs Core i7-3687U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

3015e

2020

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 512W, a 511W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-3687U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,618 vs 2,621).

Core i7-3687U

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌51100% higher power demand at 512W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-3687U better than 3015e?

Yes. Core i7-3687U is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-3687U is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-3687U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-3687U still makes the most sense overall. Core i7-3687U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

3015e makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

3015e vs Core i7-3687U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

3015e

The 3015e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Pollock (Zen) (2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FT5. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB + 4 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,618 points. Launch price was $50.

Core i7-3687U

The Core i7-3687U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,621 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the 3015e and Core i7-3687U share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the 3015e versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i7-3687U — a 35.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-3687U (base: 1.2 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The 3015e uses the Pollock (Zen) (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-3687U uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the 3015e scores 2,618 against the Core i7-3687U's 2,621 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i7-3687U. L3 cache: 4 MB on the 3015e vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-3687U.

Feature	3015e	Core i7-3687U
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.3 GHz	3.3 GHz+43%
Base Clock	1.2 GHz	2.1 GHz+75%
L3 Cache	4 MB	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB	256K (per core)+25500%
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Pollock (Zen) (2020)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	2,618	2,621
Geekbench 6 Single	—	640
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	1,240

🧠

Memory & Platform

The 3015e uses the FT5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-3687U uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 1600 memory speed. The Core i7-3687U supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (3015e) vs 2 (Core i7-3687U). PCIe lanes: 8 (3015e) vs 16 (Core i7-3687U) — the Core i7-3687U offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FT5 (3015e) and QM77,QS77 (Core i7-3687U).

Feature	3015e	Core i7-3687U
Socket	FT5	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	1600	DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	32 GB+100%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8	16+100%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (3015e) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-3687U). Both include integrated graphics — Vega 3 (3015e) and HD Graphics 4000 (Core i7-3687U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-3687U targets Enthusiast. Direct competitor: 3015e rivals Celeron N4120; Core i7-3687U rivals Ryzen 7 3700U.