A8-5500
VS
Core i3-7102E

A8-5500 vs Core i3-7102E

AMD

A8-5500

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core i3-7102E

2 Cores4 Thrd25 WWMax: 2.1 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A8-5500 is positioned at rank 472 and the Core i3-7102E is on rank 974, so the A8-5500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A8-5500

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
7153%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
6759%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
4907%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1478%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1171%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1024%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
587%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
579%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
527%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
527%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
521%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
507%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
500%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
498%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
494%
#364
Celeron G6900TE
MSRP: $53|Avg: $64
100%
#365
Core i5-8600T
MSRP: $213|Avg: $213
99%
#366
Celeron G4950
MSRP: $52|Avg: $63
99%
#367
Core i9-10900E
MSRP: $488|Avg: $450
99%
#368
Core i7-9700KF
MSRP: $374|Avg: $333
98%
#472
A8-5500
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#476
Athlon X4 830
MSRP: $70|Avg: $25
99%
#480
Athlon X4 860K
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
98%
#483
Core i7-8700
MSRP: $303|Avg: $110
97%
#487
Pentium Dual-Core E2220
MSRP: $32|Avg: $32
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-7102E

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
26988%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
25501%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
18516%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
5578%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
4418%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3865%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2214%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2185%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1989%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1989%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1967%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1914%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1887%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1880%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1863%
#974
Core i3-7102E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $80
100%
#975
Core 2 Quad Q8400
MSRP: $183|Avg: $128
98%
#976
Pentium Dual-Core E2180
MSRP: $84|Avg: $5
97%
#977
Pentium E2180
MSRP: $84|Avg: $15
97%
#978
Pentium Dual-Core E2140
MSRP: $74|Avg: $5
95%
#979
Core i7-960
MSRP: $309|Avg: $110
95%
#980
E1-1500
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
95%
#981
Core i5-2405S
MSRP: $309|Avg: $120
95%
#982
Celeron 420
MSRP: $39|Avg: $15
94%
#983
Athlon II X4 615e
MSRP: $186|Avg: $30
94%
#984
Athlon X2 BE-2350
MSRP: $90|Avg: $10
94%
#985
Core 2 Quad Q8300
MSRP: $179|Avg: $10
93%
#986
Core i7-860
MSRP: $284|Avg: $30
92%
#987
Core i7-870
MSRP: $300|Avg: $80
91%
#988
Athlon 64 X2 5000+
MSRP: $136|Avg: $42
91%
#989
Core i3-6102E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i3-7102E (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR3L-1600, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightA8-5500Core i3-7102E
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($80)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Trinity (2012−2013) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The A8-5500 (2012) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightA8-5500Core i3-7102E
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($80)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A8-5500 and Core i3-7102E

AMD

A8-5500

The A8-5500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,615 points. Launch price was $90.

Intel

Core i3-7102E

The Core i3-7102E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,599 points. Launch price was $225.

Processing Power

The A8-5500 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-7102E offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A8-5500 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the A8-5500 versus 2.1 GHz on the Core i3-7102E — a 55.2% clock advantage for the A8-5500. The A8-5500 uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-7102E uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A8-5500 scores 2,615 against the Core i3-7102E's 2,599 — a 0.6% lead for the A8-5500. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A8-5500 vs 3 MB on the Core i3-7102E.

FeatureA8-5500Core i3-7102E
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.7 GHz+76%
2.1 GHz
Base Clock
3.2 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
3 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)+100%
512 kB
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Trinity (2012−2013)
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark
2,615
2,599
Cinebench R23 Multi
659
Geekbench 6 Single
1,962
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,898
🧠

Memory & Platform

Maximum memory speed reaches 1866 on the A8-5500 versus DDR4-2400 on the Core i3-7102E — the A8-5500 supports 199.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 64 of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: FM2 (A8-5500) and Intel 100 Series,Intel 200 Series (Core i3-7102E).

FeatureA8-5500Core i3-7102E
Socket
FM2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
1866+46550%
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
64
64 GB+104857500%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: true (A8-5500) vs Yes (Core i3-7102E). Both include integrated graphics Radeon HD 7560D (A8-5500) and Intel HD Graphics 630 (Core i3-7102E) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A8-5500 rivals Pentium G2120.

FeatureA8-5500Core i3-7102E
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 7560D
Intel HD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
Yes