A8-5500
VS
Core i7-3687U

A8-5500 vs Core i7-3687U

AMD

A8-5500

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core i7-3687U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A8-5500 is positioned at rank 472 and the Core i7-3687U is on rank 654, so the A8-5500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A8-5500

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
7153%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
6759%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
4907%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1478%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1171%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1024%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
587%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
579%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
527%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
527%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
521%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
507%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
500%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
498%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
494%
#364
Celeron G6900TE
MSRP: $53|Avg: $64
100%
#365
Core i5-8600T
MSRP: $213|Avg: $213
99%
#366
Celeron G4950
MSRP: $52|Avg: $63
99%
#367
Core i9-10900E
MSRP: $488|Avg: $450
99%
#368
Core i7-9700KF
MSRP: $374|Avg: $333
98%
#472
A8-5500
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#476
Athlon X4 830
MSRP: $70|Avg: $25
99%
#480
Athlon X4 860K
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
98%
#483
Core i7-8700
MSRP: $303|Avg: $110
97%
#487
Pentium Dual-Core E2220
MSRP: $32|Avg: $32
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3687U

#642
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
896%
#643
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
882%
#644
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
810%
#645
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
806%
#646
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
799%
#648
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
772%
#649
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
740%
#650
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
739%
#651
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
719%
#654
Core i7-3687U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#662
Athlon II P360
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
99%
#665
Athlon X2 QL-64
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
99%
#666
Core 3 N350
MSRP: $225|Avg: $220
98%
#668
FX-7500
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The A8-5500 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i7-3687U is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.2% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightA8-5500Core i7-3687U
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Trinity (2012−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightA8-5500Core i7-3687U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A8-5500 and Core i7-3687U

AMD

A8-5500

The A8-5500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,615 points. Launch price was $90.

Intel

Core i7-3687U

The Core i7-3687U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,621 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The A8-5500 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-3687U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A8-5500 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the A8-5500 versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i7-3687U — a 11.4% clock advantage for the A8-5500 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The A8-5500 uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-3687U uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A8-5500 scores 2,615 against the Core i7-3687U's 2,621 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i7-3687U. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A8-5500 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-3687U.

FeatureA8-5500Core i7-3687U
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.7 GHz+12%
3.3 GHz
Base Clock
3.2 GHz+52%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)+300%
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm
22 nm-31%
Architecture
Trinity (2012−2013)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
2,615
2,621
Geekbench 6 Single
640
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,240
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-5500 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-3687U uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1866 on the A8-5500 versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i7-3687U — the A8-5500 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A8-5500 supports up to 64 of RAM compared to 32 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: FM2 (A8-5500) and QM77,QS77 (Core i7-3687U).

FeatureA8-5500Core i7-3687U
Socket
FM2
BGA1023
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
1866+62100%
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
64
32 GB+52428700%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A8-5500) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-3687U). Both include integrated graphics Radeon HD 7560D (A8-5500) and HD Graphics 4000 (Core i7-3687U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-3687U targets Enthusiast. Direct competitor: A8-5500 rivals Pentium G2120; Core i7-3687U rivals Ryzen 7 3700U.

FeatureA8-5500Core i7-3687U
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 7560D
HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Enthusiast