A8-5500 vs Athlon X4 970
A8-5500
Athlon X4 970
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A8-5500 is positioned at rank 472 and the Athlon X4 970 is on rank 582, so the A8-5500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A8-5500
Performance Per Dollar Athlon X4 970
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | A8-5500 | Athlon X4 970 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($85) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Trinity (2012−2013) / 32 nm) | ✨ Modern (Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | A8-5500 | Athlon X4 970 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($85) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A8-5500 and Athlon X4 970
A8-5500
The A8-5500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,615 points. Launch price was $90.
Athlon X4 970
The Athlon X4 970 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 2,644 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the A8-5500 and Athlon X4 970 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the A8-5500 versus 4 GHz on the Athlon X4 970 — a 7.8% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 970 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The A8-5500 uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon X4 970 uses Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the A8-5500 scores 2,615 against the Athlon X4 970's 2,644 — a 1.1% lead for the Athlon X4 970. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | A8-5500 | Athlon X4 970 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 4 GHz+8% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.8 GHz+19% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 28 nm-13% |
| Architecture | Trinity (2012−2013) | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) |
| PassMark | 2,615 | 2,644+1% |
Memory & Platform
The A8-5500 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon X4 970 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1866 on the A8-5500 versus DDR4-2400 on the Athlon X4 970 — the A8-5500 supports 199.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 64 of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A8-5500) vs 8 (Athlon X4 970) — the A8-5500 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FM2 (A8-5500) and AMD AM4 (Athlon X4 970).
| Feature | A8-5500 | Athlon X4 970 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM2 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | 1866+46550% | DDR4-2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 | 64 GB+104857500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16+100% | 8 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (A8-5500) / not specified (Athlon X4 970). The A8-5500 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7560D), while the Athlon X4 970 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A8-5500 rivals Pentium G2120.
| Feature | A8-5500 | Athlon X4 970 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 7560D | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A8-5500 and Athlon X4 970
