Core i3-7350K vs Core i5-13400F

Intel

Core i3-7350K

2 Cores4 Thrd60 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2017
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i5-13400F

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023
Core family
·······

Core i3-7350K vs Core i5-13400F Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-7350K vs Core i5-13400F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-7350K vs Core i5-13400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-7350K

2017

Why buy it

  • Costs $17 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 630, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (3,100 vs 16,211).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 20 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.3 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($179 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
  • Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +111.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +400% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 4 MB).
  • Delivers 367.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 27.3 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
  • Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
  • 25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • 9.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $196 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i3-7350K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Core i3-7350K?
Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 111.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 422.9% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 412.3% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 111.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 422.9% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 400% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 4 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-13400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-13400F comes in 9.5% more expensive on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $179 MSRP, and it still gives you a 111.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 367.8% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 27.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-13400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2017), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA1151, 400% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 4 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 2/4. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i3-7350K vs Core i5-13400F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i3-7350K

The Core i3-7350K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,886 points. Launch price was $179.

Intel

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Processing Power

The Core i3-7350K packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Core i3-7350K versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — a 9.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 4.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i3-7350K uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-7350K scores 4,886 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 134.7% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 3,100 vs 16,211 (135.8% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,298 vs 2,407, a 59.9% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 2,740 vs 11,408 (122.5% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-7350K vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.

FeatureCore i3-7350KCore i5-13400F
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
10 / 16+400%
Boost Clock
4.2 GHz
4.6 GHz+10%
Base Clock
4.2 GHz+68%
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
20 MB (total)+400%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)+20380%
1.25 MB (per core)
Process
14 nm
Intel 7 nm-50%
Architecture
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark
4,886
25,029+412%
Cinebench R23 Multi
3,100
16,211+423%
Geekbench 6 Single
1,298
2,407+85%
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,740
11,408+316%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-7350K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-13400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Core i3-7350K versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F — the Core i5-13400F supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB 200% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i3-7350K) vs 20 (Core i5-13400F) — the Core i5-13400F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z270,Intel Z170,Intel H270,Intel B250,Intel Q270,Intel Q250 (Core i3-7350K) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F).

FeatureCore i3-7350KCore i5-13400F
Socket
LGA1151
LGA1700
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+100%
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
192 GB+200%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
Yes
No
PCIe Lanes
16
20+25%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: true (Core i3-7350K) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F). The Core i3-7350K includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 630), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

FeatureCore i3-7350KCore i5-13400F
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-7350K was priced at $179, while the Core i5-13400F came in at $196. On launch pricing ($179 vs $196), Core i3-7350K was $17 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-7350K delivers 27.3 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-13400F — making the Core i5-13400F the 129.6% better value option.

FeatureCore i3-7350KCore i5-13400F
MSRP
$179-9%
$196
Performance per Dollar
27.3
127.7+368%
Release Date
2017
2023

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.