Core i3-7350K vs Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)

Core i3-7350K vs Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) Performance Spectrum

Core i3-7350K

2 / 4

4,886

0.0%

Celeron Dual-Core T1400

Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)

6 / 6

4,965

+1.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-7350K vs Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-7350K vs Phenom II X6 1055T (95W): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-7350K

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 60W instead of 95W, a 35W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 630, while Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (4,886 vs 4,965).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $179 MSRP, while Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)

2010

Why buy it

✅+1.6% higher PassMark.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-7350K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌58.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 60W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-7350K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-7350K better than Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i3-7350K is ahead with a 16.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) pulls ahead with 1.6% better PassMark. Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.6% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 6 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-7350K is the better buy right now. Core i3-7350K comes in at an unclear MSRP at $179 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 16.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.6% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (27.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-7350K makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-7350K vs Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-7350K

The Core i3-7350K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,886 points. Launch price was $179.

Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)

The Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Thuban (2010) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,965 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-7350K packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Core i3-7350K versus 3.3 GHz on the Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) — a 24% clock advantage for the Core i3-7350K (base: 4.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i3-7350K uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) uses Thuban (2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-7350K scores 4,886 against the Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)'s 4,965 — a 1.6% lead for the Phenom II X6 1055T (95W). L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-7350K vs 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X6 1055T (95W).

Feature	Core i3-7350K	Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	6 / 6+200%
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz+27%	3.3 GHz
Base Clock	4.2 GHz+50%	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	6 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Thuban (2010)
PassMark	4,886	4,965+2%
Cinebench R23 Multi	3,100	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,298	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,740	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-7350K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-7350K	Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)
Socket	LGA1151	AM3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i3-7350K) / not specified (Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)). The Core i3-7350K includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 630), while the Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) requires a dedicated GPU.