
Core i3-7350K
Popular choices:

Core i5-4440
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i3-7350K
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $5 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $184 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 60W instead of 84W, a 24W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (2,740 vs 2,837).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-4440.
Core i5-4440
2013Why buy it
- ✅+3.5% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i3-7350K.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-7350K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌2.8% HIGHER MSRP$184 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
- ❌40% higher power demand at 84W vs 60W.
Core i3-7350K
2017Core i5-4440
2013Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $5 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $184 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 60W instead of 84W, a 24W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+3.5% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i3-7350K.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (2,740 vs 2,837).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-4440.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-7350K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌2.8% HIGHER MSRP$184 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
- ❌40% higher power demand at 84W vs 60W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-7350K better than Core i5-4440?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i3-7350K | Core i5-4440 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 122 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 122 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i3-7350K | Core i5-4440 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 122 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 122 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 122 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 122 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 55 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i3-7350K | Core i5-4440 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 122 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 122 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 122 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 122 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 122 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 122 FPS | 120 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i3-7350K | Core i5-4440 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 122 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 122 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 122 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 122 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 122 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 122 FPS | 120 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-7350K and Core i5-4440

Core i3-7350K
Core i3-7350K
The Core i3-7350K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,886 points. Launch price was $179.

Core i5-4440
Core i5-4440
The Core i5-4440 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 84 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,788 points. Launch price was $335.
Processing Power
The Core i3-7350K packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-4440 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-4440 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Core i3-7350K versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-4440 — a 24% clock advantage for the Core i3-7350K (base: 4.2 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i3-7350K uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-4440 uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-7350K scores 4,886 against the Core i5-4440's 4,788 — a 2% lead for the Core i3-7350K. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,298 vs 1,031, a 22.9% lead for the Core i3-7350K that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 2,740 vs 2,837 (3.5% advantage for the Core i5-4440). L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-7350K vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-4440.
| Feature | Core i3-7350K | Core i5-4440 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+27% | 3.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.2 GHz+35% | 3.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 6 MB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| PassMark | 4,886+2% | 4,788 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 3,100 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,298+26% | 1,031 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,740 | 2,837+4% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-7350K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-4440 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Core i3-7350K versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i5-4440 — the Core i3-7350K supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-7350K supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z270,Intel Z170,Intel H270,Intel B250,Intel Q270,Intel Q250 (Core i3-7350K) and H81,B85,H87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Core i5-4440).
| Feature | Core i3-7350K | Core i5-4440 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA1150 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400+33% | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB+100% | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: true (Core i3-7350K) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-4440). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics 630 (Core i3-7350K) and HD Graphics 4600 (Core i5-4440) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4440 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i5-4440 rivals Ryzen 3 1200.
| Feature | Core i3-7350K | Core i5-4440 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 630 | HD Graphics 4600 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Core i3-7350K launched at $179 MSRP, while the Core i5-4440 debuted at $184. On MSRP ($179 vs $184), the Core i3-7350K is $5 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-7350K delivers 27.3 pts/$ vs 26.0 pts/$ for the Core i5-4440 — making the Core i3-7350K the 4.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-7350K | Core i5-4440 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $179-3% | $184 |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.3+5% | 26.0 |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2013 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












