Core i3-8100T vs Core i5-4670R

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-8100T vs Core i5-4670R FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-8100T vs Core i5-4670R: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-8100T

2018

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Costs $107 less on MSRP ($117 MSRP vs $224 MSRP).
✅Delivers 92.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 23.4 PassMark/$ ($117 MSRP vs $224 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-4670R across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Core i5-4670R

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,233 vs 5,257).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 23.4 vs 44.9 PassMark/$ ($224 MSRP vs $117 MSRP).
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-8100T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-8100T better than Core i5-4670R?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i5-4670R is ahead with a 3.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-8100T pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark. Core i3-8100T also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-8100T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-8100T is the better buy right now. Core i3-8100T comes in $107 cheaper on MSRP at $117 MSRP versus $224 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i5-4670R is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 3.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 92.3% better value on MSRP (44.9 vs 23.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-8100T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2013), 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-8100T vs Core i5-4670R Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-8100T

The Core i3-8100T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 5,257 points. Launch price was $117.

Core i5-4670R

The Core i5-4670R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,233 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-8100T and Core i5-4670R share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i3-8100T versus 3.7 GHz on the Core i5-4670R — a 17.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-4670R (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i3-8100T uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-4670R uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-8100T scores 5,257 against the Core i5-4670R's 5,233 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i3-8100T. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-8100T vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i5-4670R.

Feature	Core i3-8100T	Core i5-4670R
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz	3.7 GHz+19%
Base Clock	3.1 GHz+3%	3 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)+50%	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	5,257	5,233

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-8100T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-4670R uses BGA1364 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-8100T	Core i5-4670R
Socket	LGA1151	BGA1364
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-8100T) / not specified (Core i5-4670R). The Core i3-8100T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Core i5-4670R requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-8100T targets Desktop.

Feature	Core i3-8100T	Core i5-4670R
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 630	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-8100T was priced at $117, while the Core i5-4670R came in at $224. On launch pricing ($117 vs $224), Core i3-8100T was $107 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-8100T delivers 44.9 pts/$ vs 23.4 pts/$ for the Core i5-4670R — making the Core i3-8100T the 63.2% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-8100T	Core i5-4670R
MSRP	$117-48%	$224
Performance per Dollar	44.9+92%	23.4
Release Date	2018	2013

Search Core i3-8100T on Amazon

Search Core i5-4670R on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.