Core i3-8100T vs Xeon E3-1225 v3

Intel

Core i3-8100T

4 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2018
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E3-1225 v3

4 Cores4 Thrd84 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······

Core i3-8100T vs Xeon E3-1225 v3 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-8100T vs Xeon E3-1225 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-8100T vs Xeon E3-1225 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-8100T

2018

Why buy it

  • Costs $107 less on MSRP ($117 MSRP vs $224 MSRP).
  • Delivers 89.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 23.8 PassMark/$ ($117 MSRP vs $224 MSRP).
  • Draws 35W instead of 84W, a 49W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (5,257 vs 5,324).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).

Xeon E3-1225 v3

2013

Why buy it

  • +33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 23.8 vs 44.9 PassMark/$ ($224 MSRP vs $117 MSRP).
  • 140% higher power demand at 84W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E3-1225 v3 better than Core i3-8100T?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1225 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-8100T is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon E3-1225 v3 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3-1225 v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon E3-1225 v3 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Xeon E3-1225 v3 comes in 91.5% more expensive on MSRP at $224 MSRP versus $117 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-8100T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2018 platform. Even with 89.0% better value on paper (44.9 vs 23.8 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-8100T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-8100T vs Xeon E3-1225 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i3-8100T

The Core i3-8100T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 5,257 points. Launch price was $117.

Intel

Xeon E3-1225 v3

The Xeon E3-1225 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-WS (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 84 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,324 points. Launch price was $384.

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-8100T and Xeon E3-1225 v3 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i3-8100T versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E3-1225 v3 — a 14.9% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1225 v3 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i3-8100T uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E3-1225 v3 uses Haswell-WS (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-8100T scores 5,257 against the Xeon E3-1225 v3's 5,324 — a 1.3% lead for the Xeon E3-1225 v3. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-8100T vs 8192 kB (total) on the Xeon E3-1225 v3.

FeatureCore i3-8100TXeon E3-1225 v3
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.1 GHz
3.6 GHz+16%
Base Clock
3.1 GHz
3.2 GHz+3%
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
8192 kB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm-36%
22 nm
Architecture
Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
Haswell-WS (2013−2014)
PassMark
5,257
5,324+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi
2,000
Geekbench 6 Single
1,108
Geekbench 6 Multi
3,324
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-8100T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1225 v3 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Core i3-8100T versus DDR3-1600 on the Xeon E3-1225 v3 — the Core i3-8100T supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-8100T supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

FeatureCore i3-8100TXeon E3-1225 v3
Socket
LGA1151
LGA1150
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400+50%
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB+100%
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics UHD Graphics 630 (Core i3-8100T) and HD Graphics P4600 (Xeon E3-1225 v3) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-8100T targets Desktop, Xeon E3-1225 v3 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon E3-1225 v3 rivals Core i5-4570.

FeatureCore i3-8100TXeon E3-1225 v3
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 630
HD Graphics P4600
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Desktop
Workstation
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-8100T was priced at $117, while the Xeon E3-1225 v3 came in at $224. On launch pricing ($117 vs $224), Core i3-8100T was $107 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-8100T delivers 44.9 pts/$ vs 23.8 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1225 v3 — making the Core i3-8100T the 61.6% better value option.

FeatureCore i3-8100TXeon E3-1225 v3
MSRP
$117-48%
$224
Performance per Dollar
44.9+89%
23.8
Release Date
2018
2013

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.