Core i3-8100T vs Opteron 6328

Core i3-8100T vs Opteron 6328 Performance Spectrum

Core i3-8100T

4 / 4

5,257

0.0%

5,306

+0.9%

Athlon Silver 3050U

Ryzen Embedded V1202B

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-8100T vs Opteron 6328 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-8100T vs Opteron 6328: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-8100T

2018

Why buy it

✅Costs $458 less on MSRP ($117 MSRP vs $575 MSRP).
✅Delivers 386.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 9.2 PassMark/$ ($117 MSRP vs $575 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 115W, a 80W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Opteron 6328 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 6328 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (5,257 vs 5,306).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 6328, which brings 8 cores / 8 threads.

Opteron 6328

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +17.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 8 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.2 vs 44.9 PassMark/$ ($575 MSRP vs $117 MSRP).
❌228.6% higher power demand at 115W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-8100T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Opteron 6328 better than Core i3-8100T?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 6328 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-8100T is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Opteron 6328 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 17.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Opteron 6328 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Opteron 6328 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Opteron 6328 comes in 391.5% more expensive on MSRP at $575 MSRP versus $117 MSRP, and it still gives you a 17.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-8100T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2018 platform. Even with 386.9% better value on paper (44.9 vs 9.2 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-8100T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-8100T vs Opteron 6328 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-8100T

The Core i3-8100T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 5,257 points. Launch price was $117.

Opteron 6328

The Opteron 6328 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,306 points. Launch price was $575.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-8100T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Opteron 6328 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Opteron 6328 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i3-8100T versus 3.8 GHz on the Opteron 6328 — a 20.3% clock advantage for the Opteron 6328 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i3-8100T uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Opteron 6328 uses Abu Dhabi (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-8100T scores 5,257 against the Opteron 6328's 5,306 — a 0.9% lead for the Opteron 6328. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-8100T vs 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6328.

Feature	Core i3-8100T	Opteron 6328
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	8 / 8+100%
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz	3.8 GHz+23%
Base Clock	3.1 GHz	3.2 GHz+3%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+12700%	2 MB (per module)
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)	Abu Dhabi (2012)
PassMark	5,257	5,306

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-8100T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 6328 uses G34 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-8100T	Opteron 6328
Socket	LGA1151	G34
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-8100T) / not specified (Opteron 6328). The Core i3-8100T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Opteron 6328 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-8100T targets Desktop.

Feature	Core i3-8100T	Opteron 6328
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 630	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-8100T was priced at $117, while the Opteron 6328 came in at $575. On launch pricing ($117 vs $575), Core i3-8100T was $458 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-8100T delivers 44.9 pts/$ vs 9.2 pts/$ for the Opteron 6328 — making the Core i3-8100T the 131.8% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-8100T	Opteron 6328
MSRP	$117-80%	$575
Performance per Dollar	44.9+388%	9.2
Release Date	2018	2012

Search Core i3-8100T on Amazon

Search Opteron 6328 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.