Core i3-8121U
VS
Celeron G6900E

Core i3-8121U vs Celeron G6900E

Intel

Core i3-8121U

2 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2018
VS
Intel

Celeron G6900E

2 Cores2 Thrd46 WWMax: 3 GHz2022

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Core i3-8121U is positioned at rank #166 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-8121U

#154
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
343%
#155
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
338%
#156
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
311%
#157
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
309%
#158
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
306%
#160
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
296%
#161
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
284%
#162
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
283%
#163
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
276%
#166
Core i3-8121U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#173
Celeron N3060
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
99%
#176
Core 2 Duo T9300
MSRP: $316|Avg: $20
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G6900E

#227
Core i5-12600
MSRP: $233|Avg: $250
106%
#228
Core i7-11700T
MSRP: $323|Avg: $180
106%
#229
Core i5-10600
MSRP: $244|Avg: $159
106%
#230
Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
MSRP: $193|Avg: $100
106%
#231
Core i7-8700B
MSRP: $303|Avg: $139
105%
#232
Ryzen 3 2200G
MSRP: $99|Avg: $80
104%
#233
Core i3-9100F
MSRP: $97|Avg: $80
104%
#234
Ryzen 7 9800X3D
MSRP: $479|Avg: $479
104%
#235
Ryzen 9 3900XT
MSRP: $499|Avg: $390
103%
#236
Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G
MSRP: $176|Avg: $176
102%
#237
Core i7-14700T
MSRP: $384|Avg: $384
102%
#238
Core i3-13100TE
MSRP: $137|Avg: $137
102%
#239
Core i5-9600T
MSRP: $213|Avg: $118
101%
#240
Core i5-12400T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $192
100%
#241
Core i9-14900F
MSRP: $524|Avg: $579
100%
#242
Celeron G6900E
MSRP: $53|Avg: $53
100%
#243
Core i3-12300T
MSRP: $209|Avg: $164
100%
#244
Core i9-12900
MSRP: $519|Avg: $420
100%
#245
Ryzen 3 8300G
MSRP: $176|Avg: $176
99%
#246
Core i7-11700KF
MSRP: $374|Avg: $299
99%
#247
Core i5-10600K
MSRP: $262|Avg: $179
99%
#248
Core i3-10325
MSRP: $154|Avg: $130
98%
#249
Ryzen Embedded V2718
MSRP: $250|Avg: $200
98%
#250
Core i7-8086K
MSRP: $425|Avg: $178
98%
#251
Core i3-10300T
MSRP: $157|Avg: $100
98%
#252
Core i9-10900TE
MSRP: $309|Avg: $180
98%
#253
Core i9-12900T
MSRP: $489|Avg: $378
97%
#254
Core i5-12600T
MSRP: $223|Avg: $223
97%
#255
Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE
MSRP: $200|Avg: $180
97%
#256
Ryzen 7 1700X
MSRP: $399|Avg: $60
49%
#256
Ryzen 5 3500X
MSRP: $155|Avg: $171
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Celeron G6900E delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core i3-8121U in both compute-intensive tasks (0% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i3-8121UCeleron G6900E
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($53)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Coffee Lake-U (2018−2019) / 10 nm)
✨ Modern (Alder Lake-S (2022) / 10 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i3-8121UCeleron G6900E
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($53)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-8121U and Celeron G6900E

Intel

Core i3-8121U

The Core i3-8121U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 5 May 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,271 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Celeron G6900E

The Celeron G6900E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 46 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 4,272 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Core i3-8121U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Celeron G6900E's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i3-8121U versus 3 GHz on the Celeron G6900E — a 6.5% clock advantage for the Core i3-8121U (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i3-8121U uses the Coffee Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture (10 nm), while the Celeron G6900E uses Alder Lake-S (2022) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-8121U scores 4,271 against the Celeron G6900E's 4,272 — a 0% lead for the Celeron G6900E. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,178 vs 1,563, a 28.1% lead for the Celeron G6900E that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 2,250 vs 2,631 (15.6% advantage for the Celeron G6900E). Both processors carry 4 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCore i3-8121UCeleron G6900E
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz+7%
3 GHz
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
3 GHz+36%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
1.25 MB (per core)+400%
Process
10 nm
10 nm
Architecture
Coffee Lake-U (2018−2019)
Alder Lake-S (2022)
PassMark
4,271
4,272
Geekbench 6 Single
1,178
1,563+33%
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,250
2,631+17%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-8121U uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G6900E uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Core i3-8121U versus DDR5-4800 on the Celeron G6900E — the Celeron G6900E supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G6900E supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i3-8121U) vs 20 (Celeron G6900E) — the Celeron G6900E offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Core i3-8121U) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Celeron G6900E).

FeatureCore i3-8121UCeleron G6900E
Socket
BGA1440
LGA1700
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
DDR5-4800+25%
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
128 GB+300%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
20+25%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Core i3-8121U supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-8121U) vs VT-x (Celeron G6900E). The Celeron G6900E includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 710), while the Core i3-8121U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-8121U targets Productivity, Celeron G6900E targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i3-8121U rivals Core i3-8130U; Celeron G6900E rivals Pentium Gold G7400.

FeatureCore i3-8121UCeleron G6900E
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 710
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
VT-x
Target Use
Productivity
Budget