
Core i3-9100E

Core i7-4770R
Core i3-9100E vs Core i7-4770R Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-9100E vs Core i7-4770R FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-9100E vs Core i7-4770R: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-9100E
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $158 less on MSRP ($202 MSRP vs $360 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 77.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 32.4 vs 18.2 PassMark/$ ($202 MSRP vs $360 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4770R across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,539 vs 6,561).
- ❌38.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 47W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-4770R can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-4770R
2013Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 47W instead of 65W, a 18W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Pro Graphics 5200, while Core i3-9100E needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.2 vs 32.4 PassMark/$ ($360 MSRP vs $202 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-4770R better than Core i3-9100E?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-9100E vs Core i7-4770R Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-9100E
The Core i3-9100E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 6,539 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i7-4770R
The Core i7-4770R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,561 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i3-9100E packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-4770R's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i3-9100E versus 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-4770R — a 5.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-4770R (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i3-9100E uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-4770R uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-9100E scores 6,539 against the Core i7-4770R's 6,561 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i7-4770R. Both processors carry 6 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i3-9100E | Core i7-4770R |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 3.9 GHz+5% |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz | 3.2 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| PassMark | 6,539 | 6,561 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,163 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 3,204 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-9100E uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-4770R uses BGA1364 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-9100E | Core i7-4770R |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | BGA1364 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3L-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i3-9100E) / Yes (Core i7-4770R). The Core i7-4770R includes integrated graphics (Iris Pro Graphics 5200), while the Core i3-9100E requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i3-9100E | Core i7-4770R |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | Yes |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i3-9100E was priced at $202, while the Core i7-4770R came in at $360. On launch pricing ($202 vs $360), Core i3-9100E was $158 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-9100E delivers 32.4 pts/$ vs 18.2 pts/$ for the Core i7-4770R — making the Core i3-9100E the 55.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-9100E | Core i7-4770R |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $202-44% | $360 |
| Performance per Dollar | 32.4+78% | 18.2 |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2013 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















