Core i3-9100E
VS
Xeon E5-1620 v2

Core i3-9100E vs Xeon E5-1620 v2

Intel

Core i3-9100E

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2018
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-1620 v2

4 Cores8 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-9100E

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
1430%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
1351%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
981%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
296%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
234%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
205%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
117%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
116%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
105%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
105%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
104%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
101%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
100%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
100%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
99%
#16
Core Ultra 5 225F
MSRP: $231|Avg: $150
96%
#17
Core Ultra 7 265K
MSRP: $309|Avg: $285
95%
#18
Ryzen 9 3900
MSRP: $499|Avg: $150
94%
#19
Ryzen 5 3600X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $90
92%
#20
Core i7-14700KF
MSRP: $384|Avg: $260
92%
#21
Core i7-14700K
MSRP: $409|Avg: $270
89%
#22
Ryzen 5 4500
MSRP: $129|Avg: $85
87%
#23
Ryzen 5 5600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $115
86%
#24
Celeron G5925
MSRP: $62|Avg: $15
86%
#25
Ryzen 5 7500F
MSRP: $179|Avg: $145
85%
#26
Core Ultra 5 245
MSRP: $319|Avg: $220
84%
#27
Ryzen 7 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $86
83%
#28
Core Ultra 7 265KF
MSRP: $379|Avg: $323
83%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-1620 v2

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
9366%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1768%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
1571%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1214%
#355
Xeon w7-3455
MSRP: $2489|Avg: $2625
99%
#356
EPYC 9334
MSRP: $2990|Avg: $1810
99%
#357
Xeon w9-3575X
MSRP: $3789|Avg: $675
98%
#358
Xeon w7-3465X
MSRP: $2889|Avg: $468
98%
#359
Xeon Gold 6530
MSRP: $2128|Avg: $1846
97%
#359
EPYC 9354
MSRP: $3420|Avg: $2498
97%
#361
Xeon Silver 4114
MSRP: $612|Avg: $30
96%
#362
EPYC 7532
MSRP: $2380|Avg: $225
96%
#363
Xeon W-2191B
MSRP: $1333|Avg: $39
96%
#364
Xeon Gold 5320
MSRP: $1780|Avg: $1834
95%
#594
Xeon E5-1620 v2
MSRP: $294|Avg: $50
100%
#605
Xeon E3-1270 v3
MSRP: $339|Avg: $410
96%
#607
Xeon E3-1235
MSRP: $240|Avg: $270
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i3-9100E (2018) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-2400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i3-9100EXeon E5-1620 v2
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($30)
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Coffee Lake (2017−2019) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge-E (2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5-1620 v2 (2013) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i3-9100EXeon E5-1620 v2
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+67%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($30)
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-9100E and Xeon E5-1620 v2

Intel

Core i3-9100E

The Core i3-9100E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 6,539 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Xeon E5-1620 v2

The Xeon E5-1620 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-E (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,523 points. Launch price was $315.

Processing Power

The Core i3-9100E packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon E5-1620 v2's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i3-9100E versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-1620 v2 — a 5.3% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-1620 v2 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i3-9100E uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-1620 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-E (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-9100E scores 6,539 against the Xeon E5-1620 v2's 6,523 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i3-9100E. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-9100E vs 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1620 v2.

FeatureCore i3-9100EXeon E5-1620 v2
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.7 GHz
3.9 GHz+5%
Base Clock
3.1 GHz
3.7 GHz+19%
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
10 MB (total)+67%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm-36%
22 nm
Architecture
Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
Ivy Bridge-E (2013)
PassMark
6,539
6,523
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-9100E uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-1620 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i3-9100EXeon E5-1620 v2
Socket
LGA1151
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i3-9100E launched at $202 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-1620 v2 debuted at $294. At current prices ($30 vs $50), the Core i3-9100E is $20 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-9100E delivers 218.0 pts/$ vs 130.5 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-1620 v2 — making the Core i3-9100E the 50.2% better value option.

FeatureCore i3-9100EXeon E5-1620 v2
MSRP
$202-31%
$294
Avg Price (30d)
$30-40%
$50
Performance per Dollar
218.0+67%
130.5
Release Date
2018
2013