
Core i3-N300
Popular choices:

Core i5-1145GRE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i3-N300
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $53 less on MSRP ($309 MSRP vs $362 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 18.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 26.8 vs 22.7 PassMark/$ ($309 MSRP vs $362 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1449 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
Core i5-1145GRE
2020Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,207 vs 8,283).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.7 vs 26.8 PassMark/$ ($362 MSRP vs $309 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA1449 with DDR4, while Core i3-N300 moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.
Core i3-N300
2023Core i5-1145GRE
2020Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $53 less on MSRP ($309 MSRP vs $362 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 18.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 26.8 vs 22.7 PassMark/$ ($309 MSRP vs $362 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1449 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,207 vs 8,283).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.7 vs 26.8 PassMark/$ ($362 MSRP vs $309 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA1449 with DDR4, while Core i3-N300 moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-N300 better than Core i5-1145GRE?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i3-N300 | Core i5-1145GRE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i3-N300 | Core i5-1145GRE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 97 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 66 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i3-N300 | Core i5-1145GRE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 207 FPS | 205 FPS |
| medium | 207 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 207 FPS | 205 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 207 FPS | 205 FPS |
| medium | 207 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 207 FPS | 205 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 207 FPS | 205 FPS |
| medium | 207 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 207 FPS | 205 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i3-N300 | Core i5-1145GRE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 207 FPS | 205 FPS |
| medium | 207 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 207 FPS | 205 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 207 FPS | 205 FPS |
| medium | 207 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 207 FPS | 205 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 207 FPS | 205 FPS |
| medium | 207 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 207 FPS | 205 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-N300 and Core i5-1145GRE

Core i3-N300
Core i3-N300
The Core i3-N300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-N (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 0.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 8,283 points. Launch price was $309.

Core i5-1145GRE
Core i5-1145GRE
The Core i5-1145GRE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, LPDDR4X. Passmark benchmark score: 8,207 points. Launch price was $362.
Processing Power
The Core i3-N300 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i5-1145GRE offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i3-N300 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i3-N300 versus 4.1 GHz on the Core i5-1145GRE — a 7.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-1145GRE (base: 0.1 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Core i3-N300 uses the Alder Lake-N (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i5-1145GRE uses Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-N300 scores 8,283 against the Core i5-1145GRE's 8,207 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i3-N300. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-N300 vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i5-1145GRE.
| Feature | Core i3-N300 | Core i5-1145GRE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8+100% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz | 4.1 GHz+8% |
| Base Clock | 0.1 GHz | 1.5 GHz+1400% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per module)+60% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-N (2023) | Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) |
| PassMark | 8,283 | 8,207 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-N300 uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i5-1145GRE uses FCBGA1449 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-N300 | Core i5-1145GRE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1264 | FCBGA1449 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
Value Analysis
The Core i3-N300 launched at $309 MSRP, while the Core i5-1145GRE debuted at $362. On MSRP ($309 vs $362), the Core i3-N300 is $53 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-N300 delivers 26.8 pts/$ vs 22.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-1145GRE — making the Core i3-N300 the 16.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-N300 | Core i5-1145GRE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $309-15% | $362 |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.8+18% | 22.7 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












