Core i3-N300 vs Xeon E5-1660

Intel

Core i3-N300

8 Cores8 Thrd0 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2023
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-1660

6 Cores12 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2012
Similar parts
·······

Core i3-N300 vs Xeon E5-1660 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-N300 vs Xeon E5-1660 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-N300 vs Xeon E5-1660: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-N300

2023

Why buy it

  • Costs $771 less on MSRP ($309 MSRP vs $1,080 MSRP).
  • Delivers 247.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 26.8 vs 7.7 PassMark/$ ($309 MSRP vs $1,080 MSRP).
  • Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-1660 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (8,283 vs 8,324).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 15 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-1660, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.

Xeon E5-1660

2012

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +4.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +150% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 6 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.7 vs 26.8 PassMark/$ ($1,080 MSRP vs $309 MSRP).
  • Older platform position on LGA2011, while Core i3-N300 moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-1660 better than Core i3-N300?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-1660 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-N300 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-1660 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-1660 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 6 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon E5-1660 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Xeon E5-1660 comes in 249.5% more expensive on MSRP at $1,080 MSRP versus $309 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-N300 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 4.2% in the shared gaming data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-N300 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2012) and a healthier platform with FCBGA1264 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i3-N300 vs Xeon E5-1660 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i3-N300

The Core i3-N300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-N (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 0.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 8,283 points. Launch price was $309.

Intel

Xeon E5-1660

The Xeon E5-1660 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 15360 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 8,324 points. Launch price was $290.

Processing Power

The Core i3-N300 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-1660 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i3-N300 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i3-N300 versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-1660 — a 2.6% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-1660 (base: 0.1 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i3-N300 uses the Alder Lake-N (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon E5-1660 uses Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-N300 scores 8,283 against the Xeon E5-1660's 8,324 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E5-1660. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-N300 vs 15360 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-1660.

FeatureCore i3-N300Xeon E5-1660
Cores / Threads
8 / 8+33%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz
3.9 GHz+3%
Base Clock
0.1 GHz
3.3 GHz+3200%
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
15360 kB (total)+150%
L2 Cache
2 MB (per module)+700%
256 kB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm-78%
32 nm
Architecture
Alder Lake-N (2023)
Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013)
PassMark
8,283
8,324
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-N300 uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-1660 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i3-N300Xeon E5-1660
Socket
FCBGA1264
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+150%
PCIe 2.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-N300 was priced at $309, while the Xeon E5-1660 came in at $1080. On launch pricing ($309 vs $1080), Core i3-N300 was $771 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-N300 delivers 26.8 pts/$ vs 7.7 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-1660 — making the Core i3-N300 the 110.7% better value option.

FeatureCore i3-N300Xeon E5-1660
MSRP
$309-71%
$1080
Performance per Dollar
26.8+248%
7.7
Release Date
2023
2012

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.