Core i3-N300
VS
Xeon E5-2665

Core i3-N300 vs Xeon E5-2665

Intel

Core i3-N300

8 Cores8 Thrd0 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2023
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2665

8 Cores16 Thrd115 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-N300 is positioned at rank 761 and the Xeon E5-2665 is on rank 348, so the Xeon E5-2665 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-N300

#749
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1094%
#750
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1078%
#751
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
990%
#752
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
985%
#753
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
976%
#755
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
943%
#756
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
904%
#757
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
903%
#758
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
878%
#761
Core i3-N300
MSRP: $309|Avg: $309
100%
#767
Core i7-1250U
MSRP: $426|Avg: N/A
99%
#772
Core i7-9750HF
MSRP: $395|Avg: $395
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2665

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
5011%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
946%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
841%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
649%
#253
Xeon W-2150B
MSRP: $499|Avg: $400
99%
#255
Xeon 6517P
MSRP: $1195|Avg: $1195
99%
#348
Xeon E5-2665
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#362
Xeon E5-2667 v2
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i3-N300 (2023) utilizes Intel 7 nm technology and DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i3-N300Xeon E5-2665
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($309)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Alder Lake-N (2023) / Intel 7 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5-2665 (2012) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i3-N300Xeon E5-2665
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($309)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-N300 and Xeon E5-2665

Intel

Core i3-N300

The Core i3-N300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-N (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 0.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 8,283 points. Launch price was $309.

Intel

Xeon E5-2665

The Xeon E5-2665 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 8,293 points. Launch price was $142.

Processing Power

The Core i3-N300 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, matching the Xeon E5-2665's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i3-N300 versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon E5-2665 — a 20.3% clock advantage for the Core i3-N300 (base: 0.1 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i3-N300 uses the Alder Lake-N (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2665 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-N300 scores 8,283 against the Xeon E5-2665's 8,293 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon E5-2665. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-N300 vs 20480 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2665.

FeatureCore i3-N300Xeon E5-2665
Cores / Threads
8 / 8
8 / 16
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz+23%
3.1 GHz
Base Clock
0.1 GHz
2.4 GHz+2300%
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
20480 kB (total)+233%
L2 Cache
2 MB (per module)+700%
256 kB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm-78%
32 nm
Architecture
Alder Lake-N (2023)
Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
PassMark
8,283
8,293
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-N300 uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-2665 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i3-N300Xeon E5-2665
Socket
FCBGA1264
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
384 GB
RAM Channels
4
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
40
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i3-N300) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2665). Primary use case: Xeon E5-2665 targets Server.

FeatureCore i3-N300Xeon E5-2665
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Server