Core i3-N300 vs Core i5-12400F

Intel

Core i3-N300

8 Cores8 Thrd0 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2023
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i5-12400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2022
Core family
·······

Core i3-N300 vs Core i5-12400F Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-N300 vs Core i5-12400F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-N300 vs Core i5-12400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-N300

2023

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • Lower PassMark (8,283 vs 19,532).
    • Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 18 MB).
    • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 26.8 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($309 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
    • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.

    Core i5-12400F

    2022

    Why buy it

    • Better for gaming: +56.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • +200% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 6 MB).
    • Costs $135 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $309 MSRP).
    • Delivers 318.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 26.8 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $309 MSRP).
    • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

    Trade-offs

    • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Core i5-12400F better than Core i3-N300?
    Yes. Core i5-12400F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 56.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 135.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Core i5-12400F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 56.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-12400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 135.8% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 200% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 6 MB).
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Core i5-12400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-12400F comes in $135 cheaper on MSRP at $174 MSRP versus $309 MSRP, and it still gives you a 56.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 318.8% better value on MSRP (112.3 vs 26.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Core i3-N300 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Core i3-N300 vs Core i5-12400F Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Core i3-N300

    The Core i3-N300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-N (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 0.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 8,283 points. Launch price was $309.

    Intel

    Core i5-12400F

    The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

    Processing Power

    The Core i3-N300 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i5-12400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i3-N300 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i3-N300 versus 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F — a 14.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F (base: 0.1 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i3-N300 uses the Alder Lake-N (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i5-12400F uses Alder Lake-S (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-N300 scores 8,283 against the Core i5-12400F's 19,532 — a 80.9% lead for the Core i5-12400F. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-N300 vs 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F.

    FeatureCore i3-N300Core i5-12400F
    Cores / Threads
    8 / 8+33%
    6 / 12
    Boost Clock
    3.8 GHz
    4.4 GHz+16%
    Base Clock
    0.1 GHz
    2.5 GHz+2400%
    L3 Cache
    6 MB (total)
    18 MB (total)+200%
    L2 Cache
    2 MB (per module)+60%
    1.25 MB (per core)
    Process
    Intel 7 nm
    Intel 7 nm
    Architecture
    Alder Lake-N (2023)
    Alder Lake-S (2022)
    PassMark
    8,283
    19,532+136%
    Cinebench R23 Multi
    12,380
    Geekbench 6 Single
    1,700
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    657
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Core i3-N300 uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i5-12400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureCore i3-N300Core i5-12400F
    Socket
    FCBGA1264
    LGA1700
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 5.0+67%
    PCIe 3.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
    Max RAM Capacity
    128 GB
    RAM Channels
    2
    ECC Support
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    20
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: not specified (Core i3-N300) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.

    FeatureCore i3-N300Core i5-12400F
    Integrated GPU
    No
    Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-d, EPT
    Target Use
    Gaming Performance/Value
    💰

    Value Analysis

    At launch, the Core i3-N300 was priced at $309, while the Core i5-12400F came in at $174. On launch pricing ($309 vs $174), Core i5-12400F was $135 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-N300 delivers 26.8 pts/$ vs 112.3 pts/$ for the Core i5-12400F — making the Core i5-12400F the 122.9% better value option.

    FeatureCore i3-N300Core i5-12400F
    MSRP
    $309
    $174-44%
    Performance per Dollar
    26.8
    112.3+319%
    Release Date
    2023
    2022

    Affiliate Disclosure

    ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

    Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.