
Core i5-10310U
Popular choices:

Core i7-4710MQ
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-10310U
2020Why buy it
- ✅+35.2% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 47W, a 46W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core i7-4710MQ
2013Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (950 vs 1,284).
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,792 vs 5,864).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $378 MSRP, while Core i5-10310U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌4600% higher power demand at 47W vs 1W.
Core i5-10310U
2020Core i7-4710MQ
2013Why buy it
- ✅+35.2% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 47W, a 46W reduction.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (950 vs 1,284).
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,792 vs 5,864).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $378 MSRP, while Core i5-10310U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌4600% higher power demand at 47W vs 1W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-10310U better than Core i7-4710MQ?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-10310U | Core i7-4710MQ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-10310U | Core i7-4710MQ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 101 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 63 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-10310U | Core i7-4710MQ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 147 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 147 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 147 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 147 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 147 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 147 FPS | 145 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-10310U | Core i7-4710MQ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 147 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 147 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 147 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 147 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 147 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 147 FPS | 145 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10310U and Core i7-4710MQ

Core i5-10310U
Core i5-10310U
The Core i5-10310U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 13 May 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,864 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i7-4710MQ
Core i7-4710MQ
The Core i7-4710MQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 May 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,792 points. Launch price was $378.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-10310U and Core i7-4710MQ share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-10310U versus 3.5 GHz on the Core i7-4710MQ — a 22.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-10310U (base: 1.7 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i5-10310U uses the Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-4710MQ uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10310U scores 5,864 against the Core i7-4710MQ's 5,792 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i5-10310U. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,284 vs 950, a 29.9% lead for the Core i5-10310U that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 6 MB on the Core i5-10310U vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-4710MQ.
| Feature | Core i5-10310U | Core i7-4710MQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+26% | 3.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.7 GHz | 2.5 GHz+47% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| PassMark | 5,864+1% | 5,792 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,284+35% | 950 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 3,200 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10310U uses the FCBGA1528 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-4710MQ uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10310U versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i7-4710MQ — the Core i5-10310U supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-10310U supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.
| Feature | Core i5-10310U | Core i7-4710MQ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1528 | PGA946 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666+33% | DDR3L-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB+100% | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-10310U) vs VT-x, EPT (Core i7-4710MQ). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics for 10th Gen (Core i5-10310U) and Intel HD Graphics 4600 (Core i7-4710MQ) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10310U targets Business Laptop, Core i7-4710MQ targets Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-10310U rivals Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U.
| Feature | Core i5-10310U | Core i7-4710MQ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics for 10th Gen | Intel HD Graphics 4600 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, EPT |
| Target Use | Business Laptop | Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













