Core i5-10310U vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U

Core i5-10310U vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U Performance Spectrum

Core i5-10310U

4 / 8

5,864

+0.6%

5,831

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-10310U vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-10310U vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-10310U

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Draws 1W instead of 15W, a 14W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics for 10th Gen, while Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U

2019

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10310U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (5,831 vs 5,864).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
❌1400% higher power demand at 15W vs 1W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-10310U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-10310U better than Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U?

Yes. Core i5-10310U is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 16.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-10310U is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 16.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-10310U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-10310U still makes the most sense overall. Core i5-10310U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 16.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-10310U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2019), 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-10310U vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-10310U

The Core i5-10310U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 13 May 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,864 points. Launch price was $149.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U

The Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 5,831 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10310U packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-10310U versus 3.5 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U — a 22.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-10310U (base: 1.7 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i5-10310U uses the Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U uses Picasso (2019−2022) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10310U scores 5,864 against the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U's 5,831 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i5-10310U. L3 cache: 6 MB on the Core i5-10310U vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U.

Feature	Core i5-10310U	Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 4
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+26%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	1.7 GHz	2.1 GHz+24%
L3 Cache	6 MB+50%	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB	512K (per core)+51100%
Process	14 nm	12 nm-14%
Architecture	Comet Lake-U (2019−2020)	Picasso (2019−2022)
PassMark	5,864	5,831
Geekbench 6 Single	1,284	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10310U uses the FCBGA1528 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-10310U	Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
Socket	FCBGA1528	FP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-10310U) / not specified (Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U). The Core i5-10310U includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics for 10th Gen), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10310U targets Business Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-10310U rivals Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U.