Core i5-1035G1 vs Core i7-6770HQ

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-1035G1

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 45W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i7-6770HQ

2016

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,769 vs 3,600).
❌200% higher power demand at 45W vs 15W.

Core i5-1035G1

2019

Core i7-6770HQ

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 45W, a 30W reduction.

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,769 vs 3,600).
❌200% higher power demand at 45W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-1035G1 better than Core i7-6770HQ?

Yes. Core i5-1035G1 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 2.7% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data, 103.5% better Geekbench multi-core, 1.3% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-1035G1 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 2.7% more average FPS across 3 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-1035G1 is the better fit. You are getting 103.5% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-1035G1 still looks like the safer overall buy. Core i5-1035G1 is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 2.7% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-1035G1 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-1035G1 Benchmark Check

Core i7-6770HQ Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-1035G1	Core i7-6770HQ
1080p
low	179 FPS	169 FPS
medium	145 FPS	135 FPS
high	116 FPS	106 FPS
ultra	91 FPS	83 FPS
1440p
low	147 FPS	142 FPS
medium	116 FPS	111 FPS
high	92 FPS	87 FPS
ultra	72 FPS	68 FPS
4K
low	69 FPS	68 FPS
medium	58 FPS	57 FPS
high	46 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	36 FPS	35 FPS

Open Core i5-1035G1 Open Core i7-6770HQ

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-1035G1	Core i7-6770HQ
1080p
low	125 FPS	177 FPS
medium	108 FPS	153 FPS
high	100 FPS	141 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	106 FPS
1440p
low	108 FPS	159 FPS
medium	94 FPS	133 FPS
high	88 FPS	121 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	95 FPS
4K
low	84 FPS	124 FPS
medium	77 FPS	108 FPS
high	62 FPS	84 FPS
ultra	47 FPS	61 FPS

Open Core i5-1035G1 Open Core i7-6770HQ

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-1035G1	Core i7-6770HQ
1080p
low	179 FPS	177 FPS
medium	179 FPS	177 FPS
high	179 FPS	177 FPS
ultra	179 FPS	177 FPS
1440p
low	179 FPS	177 FPS
medium	179 FPS	177 FPS
high	179 FPS	177 FPS
ultra	179 FPS	177 FPS
4K
low	179 FPS	177 FPS
medium	179 FPS	177 FPS
high	179 FPS	177 FPS
ultra	179 FPS	177 FPS

Open Core i5-1035G1 Open Core i7-6770HQ

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-1035G1	Core i7-6770HQ
1080p
low	179 FPS	177 FPS
medium	179 FPS	177 FPS
high	179 FPS	177 FPS
ultra	179 FPS	177 FPS
1440p
low	179 FPS	177 FPS
medium	179 FPS	177 FPS
high	179 FPS	177 FPS
ultra	179 FPS	177 FPS
4K
low	179 FPS	177 FPS
medium	179 FPS	177 FPS
high	179 FPS	177 FPS
ultra	179 FPS	177 FPS

Open Core i5-1035G1 Open Core i7-6770HQ

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-1035G1 and Core i7-6770HQ

Core i5-1035G1

The Core i5-1035G1 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake (Client) (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1526. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,174 points. Launch price was $297.

Core i7-6770HQ

The Core i7-6770HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,083 points. Launch price was $434.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-1035G1 and Core i7-6770HQ share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i5-1035G1 versus 3.5 GHz on the Core i7-6770HQ — a 2.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-1035G1 (base: 1 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i5-1035G1 uses the Ice Lake (Client) (2019) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i7-6770HQ uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-1035G1 scores 7,174 against the Core i7-6770HQ's 7,083 — a 1.3% lead for the Core i5-1035G1. Multi-core Geekbench: 3,600 vs 1,769 (68.2% advantage for the Core i5-1035G1). L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-1035G1 vs 6 MB on the Core i7-6770HQ.

Feature	Core i5-1035G1	Core i7-6770HQ
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz+3%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	1 GHz	2.6 GHz+160%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	6 MB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	1 MB+300%
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Ice Lake (Client) (2019)	Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark	7,174+1%	7,083
Cinebench R23 Multi	3,800	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,100	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	3,600+104%	1,769

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-1035G1 uses the FCBGA1526 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-6770HQ uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-1035G1 versus 2133 on the Core i7-6770HQ — the Core i7-6770HQ supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 64 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Integrated PCH (Core i5-1035G1) and HM170,QM170,CM236 (Core i7-6770HQ).

Feature	Core i5-1035G1	Core i7-6770HQ
Socket	FCBGA1526	BGA1440
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	2133+53225%
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+104857500%	64
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Core i5-1035G1 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-1035G1) vs true (Core i7-6770HQ). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics G1 (Core i5-1035G1) and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 (Core i7-6770HQ) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-1035G1 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Core i5-1035G1 rivals Ryzen 5 4500U.