Core i5-1035G1 vs Xeon E3-1241 v3

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-1035G1 vs Xeon E3-1241 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-1035G1 vs Xeon E3-1241 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-1035G1

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 15W instead of 80W, a 65W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics G1, while Xeon E3-1241 v3 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E3-1241 v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).

Xeon E3-1241 v3

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,169 vs 7,174).
❌Launch MSRP is still $273 MSRP, while Core i5-1035G1 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌433.3% higher power demand at 80W vs 15W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-1035G1 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-1035G1 better than Xeon E3-1241 v3?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1241 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-1035G1 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-1035G1 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-1035G1 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E3-1241 v3 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i5-1035G1 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $273 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E3-1241 v3 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 6.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E3-1241 v3 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (26.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-1035G1 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2014), more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-1035G1 vs Xeon E3-1241 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-1035G1

The Core i5-1035G1 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake (Client) (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1526. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,174 points. Launch price was $297.

Xeon E3-1241 v3

The Xeon E3-1241 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-WS (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 7,169 points. Launch price was $273.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-1035G1 and Xeon E3-1241 v3 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i5-1035G1 versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon E3-1241 v3 — a 8% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1241 v3 (base: 1 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i5-1035G1 uses the Ice Lake (Client) (2019) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon E3-1241 v3 uses Haswell-WS (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-1035G1 scores 7,174 against the Xeon E3-1241 v3's 7,169 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i5-1035G1. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-1035G1 vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1241 v3.

Feature	Core i5-1035G1	Xeon E3-1241 v3
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz	3.9 GHz+8%
Base Clock	1 GHz	3.5 GHz+250%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	10 nm-55%	22 nm
Architecture	Ice Lake (Client) (2019)	Haswell-WS (2013−2014)
PassMark	7,174	7,169
Cinebench R23 Multi	3,800	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,100	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	3,600	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-1035G1 uses the FCBGA1526 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1241 v3 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-1035G1	Xeon E3-1241 v3
Socket	FCBGA1526	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-1035G1) / not specified (Xeon E3-1241 v3). The Core i5-1035G1 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics G1), while the Xeon E3-1241 v3 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-1035G1 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Core i5-1035G1 rivals Ryzen 5 4500U.