Core i5-1035G1 vs Core i7-7820HQ

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-1035G1 vs Core i7-7820HQ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-1035G1 vs Core i7-7820HQ: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-1035G1

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 45W, a 30W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics G1, while Core i7-7820HQ needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-7820HQ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (7,174 vs 7,184).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).

Core i7-7820HQ

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Trade-offs

❌200% higher power demand at 45W vs 15W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-1035G1 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-7820HQ better than Core i5-1035G1?

Yes. Core i7-7820HQ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-7820HQ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-7820HQ is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-7820HQ still makes the most sense overall. Core i7-7820HQ comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-1035G1 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-1035G1 vs Core i7-7820HQ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-1035G1

The Core i5-1035G1 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake (Client) (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1526. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,174 points. Launch price was $297.

Core i7-7820HQ

The Core i7-7820HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake-H (2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,184 points. Launch price was $378.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-1035G1 and Core i7-7820HQ share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i5-1035G1 versus 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-7820HQ — a 8% clock advantage for the Core i7-7820HQ (base: 1 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i5-1035G1 uses the Ice Lake (Client) (2019) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i7-7820HQ uses Kaby Lake-H (2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-1035G1 scores 7,174 against the Core i7-7820HQ's 7,184 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i7-7820HQ. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-1035G1 vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-7820HQ.

Feature	Core i5-1035G1	Core i7-7820HQ
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz	3.9 GHz+8%
Base Clock	1 GHz	2.9 GHz+190%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Ice Lake (Client) (2019)	Kaby Lake-H (2017)
PassMark	7,174	7,184
Cinebench R23 Multi	3,800	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,100	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	3,600	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-1035G1 uses the FCBGA1526 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-7820HQ uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-1035G1	Core i7-7820HQ
Socket	FCBGA1526	BGA1440
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-1035G1) / not specified (Core i7-7820HQ). The Core i5-1035G1 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics G1), while the Core i7-7820HQ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-1035G1 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Core i5-1035G1 rivals Ryzen 5 4500U.