
Core i5-10600K
Popular choices:

Core i7-1355U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-10600K
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 630, while Core i7-1355U needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $262 MSRP, while Core i7-1355U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌733.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i7-1355U moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Core i7-1355U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 125W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,116 vs 14,247).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-10600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-10600K
2020Core i7-1355U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 630, while Core i7-1355U needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 125W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $262 MSRP, while Core i7-1355U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌733.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i7-1355U moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,116 vs 14,247).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-10600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-10600K better than Core i7-1355U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-10600K | Core i7-1355U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 301 FPS | 280 FPS |
| medium | 263 FPS | 250 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 189 FPS | 182 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 247 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 195 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 90 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-10600K | Core i7-1355U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 356 FPS | 241 FPS |
| medium | 356 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 338 FPS | 182 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 161 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 356 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 332 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 262 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 343 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 254 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 214 FPS | 119 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-10600K | Core i7-1355U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 356 FPS | 353 FPS |
| medium | 356 FPS | 353 FPS |
| high | 356 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 353 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 356 FPS | 353 FPS |
| medium | 356 FPS | 353 FPS |
| high | 356 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 353 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 356 FPS | 353 FPS |
| medium | 356 FPS | 353 FPS |
| high | 356 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 347 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-10600K | Core i7-1355U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 356 FPS | 353 FPS |
| medium | 356 FPS | 353 FPS |
| high | 356 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 353 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 356 FPS | 353 FPS |
| medium | 356 FPS | 353 FPS |
| high | 356 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 353 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 356 FPS | 353 FPS |
| medium | 356 FPS | 353 FPS |
| high | 356 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 353 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10600K and Core i7-1355U

Core i5-10600K
Core i5-10600K
The Core i5-10600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,247 points. Launch price was $262.

Core i7-1355U
Core i7-1355U
The Core i7-1355U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-U (2023) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 14,116 points. Launch price was $469.
Processing Power
The Core i5-10600K packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i7-1355U offers 10 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-1355U has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i5-10600K versus 5 GHz on the Core i7-1355U — a 4.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-1355U (base: 4.1 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Core i5-10600K uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-1355U uses Raptor Lake-U (2023) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10600K scores 14,247 against the Core i7-1355U's 14,116 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i5-10600K. Both processors carry 12 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i5-10600K | Core i7-1355U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 10 / 12+67% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz | 5 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 4.1 GHz+141% | 1.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core)+400% |
| Process | 14 nm | Intel 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Raptor Lake-U (2023) |
| PassMark | 14,247 | 14,116 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10600K uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-1355U uses FCBGA1744 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-10600K | Core i7-1355U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | FCBGA1744 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
The Core i5-10600K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 630), while the Core i7-1355U requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i5-10600K | Core i7-1355U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












