Core i5-10600K vs Ryzen 5 4600HS

Core i5-10600K vs Ryzen 5 4600HS Performance Spectrum

Core i5-10600K

6 / 12

14,247

0.0%

14,349

+0.7%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-10600K vs Ryzen 5 4600HS FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-10600K vs Ryzen 5 4600HS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-10600K

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +28.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 5 4600HS needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (14,247 vs 14,349).
❌Launch MSRP is still $262 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 4600HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌257.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 35W.

Ryzen 5 4600HS

2020

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 35W instead of 125W, a 90W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10600K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-10600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 4600HS better than Core i5-10600K?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i5-10600K is ahead with a 28.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 4600HS pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark. Core i5-10600K also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 4600HS is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 4600HS is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-10600K is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen 5 4600HS comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $262 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i5-10600K is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 28.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-10600K is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (54.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 4600HS makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-10600K vs Ryzen 5 4600HS Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-10600K

The Core i5-10600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,247 points. Launch price was $262.

Ryzen 5 4600HS

The Ryzen 5 4600HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir-HS (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-4266. Passmark benchmark score: 14,349 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-10600K and Ryzen 5 4600HS share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i5-10600K versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 4600HS — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-10600K (base: 4.1 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i5-10600K uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 4600HS uses Renoir-HS (Zen 2) (2020) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10600K scores 14,247 against the Ryzen 5 4600HS's 14,349 — a 0.7% lead for the Ryzen 5 4600HS. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10600K vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 4600HS.

Feature	Core i5-10600K	Ryzen 5 4600HS
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz+20%	4 GHz
Base Clock	4.1 GHz+37%	3 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)+50%	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	7 nm-50%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Renoir-HS (Zen 2) (2020)
PassMark	14,247	14,349

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10600K uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 4600HS uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.