Core i5-11260H vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X

Core i5-11260H vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X Performance Spectrum

Core i5-11260H

6 / 12

15,459

0.0%

15,570

+0.7%

Ryzen 3 7320U

FX-9590

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U

Ryzen Embedded V3C18I

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX

Ryzen 9 8940HX

Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-11260H vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-11260H vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-11260H

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (15,459 vs 15,570).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $399 MSRP, while Core i5-11260H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-11260H better than Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i5-11260H is ahead with a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark. Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-11260H is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i5-11260H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $399 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.7% better PassMark. Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (39.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-11260H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-11260H vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-11260H

The Core i5-11260H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 15,459 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X

The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 15,570 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-11260H packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-11260H versus 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X — a 14.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-11260H (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i5-11260H uses the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-11260H scores 15,459 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X's 15,570 — a 0.7% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-11260H vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X.

Feature	Core i5-11260H	Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+16%	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	3.4 GHz+31%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	16 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	512K (per core)+40860%
Process	10 nm SuperFin-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Tiger Lake-H (2021)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	15,459	15,570

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-11260H uses the FCBGA1787 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-11260H	Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
Socket	FCBGA1787	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	—	64 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	24