Core i5-11260H vs Xeon D-1746TER

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-11260H vs Xeon D-1746TER FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-11260H vs Xeon D-1746TER: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-11260H

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 67W, a 32W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (15,459 vs 15,660).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 15 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-1746TER, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.

Xeon D-1746TER

2022

Why buy it

✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-11260H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌91.4% higher power demand at 67W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon D-1746TER better than Core i5-11260H?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon D-1746TER makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-11260H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon D-1746TER is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon D-1746TER still makes the most sense overall. Xeon D-1746TER comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.3% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-1746TER makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2021), 25% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 12 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 20 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-11260H vs Xeon D-1746TER Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-11260H

The Core i5-11260H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 15,459 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon D-1746TER

The Xeon D-1746TER is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 67 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 15,660 points. Launch price was $1,069.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-11260H packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon D-1746TER offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon D-1746TER has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-11260H versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon D-1746TER — a 34.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-11260H (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-11260H uses the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Xeon D-1746TER uses Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-11260H scores 15,459 against the Xeon D-1746TER's 15,660 — a 1.3% lead for the Xeon D-1746TER. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-11260H vs 15 MB (total) on the Xeon D-1746TER.

Feature	Core i5-11260H	Xeon D-1746TER
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	10 / 20+67%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+42%	3.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz+30%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	15 MB (total)+25%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	1.25 MB (per core)
Process	10 nm SuperFin	10 nm
Architecture	Tiger Lake-H (2021)	Ice Lake-D (2022−2023)
PassMark	15,459	15,660+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-11260H uses the FCBGA1787 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon D-1746TER uses FCBGA2227 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.