
Core i5-1130G7
Popular choices:

Core i7-3930K
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-1130G7
2020Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 130W, a 115W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-3930K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
Core i7-3930K
2011Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,204 vs 8,261).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $583 MSRP, while Core i5-1130G7 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌766.7% higher power demand at 130W vs 15W.
Core i5-1130G7
2020Core i7-3930K
2011Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 130W, a 115W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-3930K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,204 vs 8,261).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $583 MSRP, while Core i5-1130G7 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌766.7% higher power demand at 130W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-1130G7 better than Core i7-3930K?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-1130G7 | Core i7-3930K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 121 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-1130G7 | Core i7-3930K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 205 FPS |
| medium | 112 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 113 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 127 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 94 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-1130G7 | Core i7-3930K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 207 FPS | 205 FPS |
| medium | 207 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 207 FPS | 205 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 207 FPS | 205 FPS |
| medium | 207 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 207 FPS | 205 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 207 FPS | 205 FPS |
| medium | 207 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 207 FPS | 205 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-1130G7 | Core i7-3930K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 207 FPS | 205 FPS |
| medium | 207 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 207 FPS | 205 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 207 FPS | 205 FPS |
| medium | 207 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 207 FPS | 205 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 207 FPS | 205 FPS |
| medium | 207 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 207 FPS | 205 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-1130G7 and Core i7-3930K

Core i5-1130G7
Core i5-1130G7
The Core i5-1130G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1598. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,261 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i7-3930K
Core i7-3930K
The Core i7-3930K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 8,204 points. Launch price was $611.
Processing Power
The Core i5-1130G7 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i7-3930K offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-3930K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Core i5-1130G7 versus 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-3930K — a 5.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-1130G7 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i5-1130G7 uses the Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Core i7-3930K uses Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-1130G7 scores 8,261 against the Core i7-3930K's 8,204 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i5-1130G7. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i5-1130G7 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-3930K.
| Feature | Core i5-1130G7 | Core i7-3930K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+5% | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.1 GHz | 3.2 GHz+191% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 12 MB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+400% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm SuperFin-69% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) | Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 8,261 | 8,204 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 731 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-1130G7 uses the FCBGA1598 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i7-3930K uses LGA2011 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-1130G7 | Core i7-3930K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1598 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+100% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 4 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 40 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i5-1130G7) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-3930K). Primary use case: Core i7-3930K targets HEDT Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i7-3930K rivals FX-8350.
| Feature | Core i5-1130G7 | Core i7-3930K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | HEDT Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












