Core i5-1130G7 vs M1

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-1130G7 vs M1 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-1130G7 vs M1: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-1130G7

2020

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than M1 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).

M1

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (8,207 vs 8,261).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-1130G7 better than M1?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, M1 is ahead with a 9.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-1130G7 pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark. M1 also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-1130G7 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-1130G7 still makes the most sense overall. Core i5-1130G7 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

M1 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Core i5-1130G7 vs M1 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-1130G7

The Core i5-1130G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1598. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,261 points. Launch price was $149.

M1

The M1 is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 10 November 2020 (5 years ago). It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.064 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Passmark benchmark score: 8,207 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-1130G7 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the M1 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the M1 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Core i5-1130G7 versus 3.2 GHz on the M1 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-1130G7 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 2.064 GHz). The Core i5-1130G7 is built on the Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-1130G7 scores 8,261 against the M1's 8,207 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i5-1130G7. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i5-1130G7 vs 16 MB on the M1.

Feature	Core i5-1130G7	M1
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	8 / 8+100%
Boost Clock	4 GHz+25%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	1.1 GHz	2.064 GHz+88%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	16 MB+100%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	16 MB+1180%
Process	10 nm SuperFin	5 nm-50%
Architecture	Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021)	—
PassMark	8,261	8,207