
Core i5-11400T

Core i5-13400F
Core i5-11400T vs Core i5-13400F Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-11400T vs Core i5-13400F FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-11400T vs Core i5-13400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-11400T
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $14 less on MSRP ($182 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD 730, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (3,891 vs 16,211).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 71.6 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($182 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +47.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Delivers 78.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 71.6 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $182 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌7.7% HIGHER MSRP$196 MSRPvs$182 MSRP
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-11400T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13400F better than Core i5-11400T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-11400T vs Core i5-13400F Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-11400T
The Core i5-11400T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,034 points. Launch price was $182.

Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.
Processing Power
The Core i5-11400T packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i5-11400T versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — a 21.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 1.3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i5-11400T uses the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-11400T scores 13,034 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 63% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 3,891 vs 16,211 (122.6% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,767 vs 2,407, a 30.7% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 6,179 vs 11,408 (59.5% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-11400T vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.
| Feature | Core i5-11400T | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 10 / 16+67% |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 4.6 GHz+24% |
| Base Clock | 1.3 GHz | 2.5 GHz+92% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 20 MB (total)+67% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core)+20380% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | Intel 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Rocket Lake (2021) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 13,034 | 25,029+92% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 3,891 | 16,211+317% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,767 | 2,407+36% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 6,179 | 11,408+85% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-11400T uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i5-13400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-11400T versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F — the Core i5-13400F supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H510,B560,Z590,H470,Z490 (Core i5-11400T) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F).
| Feature | Core i5-11400T | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 192 GB+50% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Core i5-11400T supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-11400T) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F). The Core i5-11400T includes integrated graphics (UHD 730), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-11400T targets Productivity, Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-11400T rivals Core i5-11400; Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core i5-11400T | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD 730 | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Productivity | Gaming |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-11400T was priced at $182, while the Core i5-13400F came in at $196. On launch pricing ($182 vs $196), Core i5-11400T was $14 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-11400T delivers 71.6 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-13400F — making the Core i5-13400F the 56.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-11400T | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $182-7% | $196 |
| Performance per Dollar | 71.6 | 127.7+78% |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














