
Core i5-11400T

Xeon E5-2685 v3
Core i5-11400T vs Xeon E5-2685 v3 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-11400T vs Xeon E5-2685 v3 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-11400T vs Xeon E5-2685 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-11400T
2021Why buy it
- β +0.7% higher PassMark.
- β Costs $1,908 less on MSRP ($182 MSRP vs $2,090 MSRP).
- β Delivers 1056.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.6 vs 6.2 PassMark/$ ($182 MSRP vs $2,090 MSRP).
- β Draws 35W instead of 120W, a 85W reduction.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2685 v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βSmaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 30 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2685 v3, which brings 12 cores / 12 threads.
Xeon E5-2685 v3
2014Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +22.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +150% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 12 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 12 threads.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (12,944 vs 13,034).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 6.2 vs 71.6 PassMark/$ ($2,090 MSRP vs $182 MSRP).
- β242.9% higher power demand at 120W vs 35W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i5-11400T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-11400T.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-11400T better than Xeon E5-2685 v3?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-11400T vs Xeon E5-2685 v3 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-11400T
The Core i5-11400T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,034 points. Launch price was $182.

Xeon E5-2685 v3
The Xeon E5-2685 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014β2015) architecture. It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 12,944 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i5-11400T packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2685 v3 offers 12 cores / 12 threads β the Xeon E5-2685 v3 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i5-11400T versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2685 v3 β a 11.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-11400T (base: 1.3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i5-11400T uses the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2685 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014β2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-11400T scores 13,034 against the Xeon E5-2685 v3's 12,944 β a 0.7% lead for the Core i5-11400T. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-11400T vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2685 v3.
| Feature | Core i5-11400T | Xeon E5-2685 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 12 / 12+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+12% | 3.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.3 GHz | 2.6 GHz+100% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 30 MB (total)+150% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Rocket Lake (2021) | Haswell-EP (2014β2015) |
| PassMark | 13,034 | 12,944 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 3,891 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,767 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 6,179 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-11400T uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2685 v3 uses LGA2011-3 (PCIe 5.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-11400T | Xeon E5-2685 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | LGA2011-3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 2 | β |
| ECC Support | No | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-11400T) / not specified (Xeon E5-2685 v3). The Core i5-11400T includes integrated graphics (UHD 730), while the Xeon E5-2685 v3 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-11400T targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i5-11400T rivals Core i5-11400.
| Feature | Core i5-11400T | Xeon E5-2685 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | β |
| IGPU Model | UHD 730 | β |
| Unlocked | No | β |
| AVX-512 | Yes | β |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | β |
| Target Use | Productivity | β |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-11400T was priced at $182, while the Xeon E5-2685 v3 came in at $2090. On launch pricing ($182 vs $2090), Core i5-11400T was $1908 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-11400T delivers 71.6 pts/$ vs 6.2 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2685 v3 β making the Core i5-11400T the 168.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-11400T | Xeon E5-2685 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $182-91% | $2090 |
| Performance per Dollar | 71.6+1055% | 6.2 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2014 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














