
Core i5-11500

Xeon E5-2689 v4
Core i5-11500 vs Xeon E5-2689 v4 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-11500 vs Xeon E5-2689 v4 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-11500 vs Xeon E5-2689 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-11500
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,531 less on MSRP ($192 MSRP vs $2,723 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1319.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 6.3 PassMark/$ ($192 MSRP vs $2,723 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2689 v4, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
Xeon E5-2689 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅+108.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-11500 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,084 vs 17,096).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.3 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($2,723 MSRP vs $192 MSRP).
- ❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-11500 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-11500 better than Xeon E5-2689 v4?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-11500 vs Xeon E5-2689 v4 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-11500
The Core i5-11500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 17,096 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-2689 v4
The Xeon E5-2689 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 17,084 points. Launch price was $2,723.
Processing Power
The Core i5-11500 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2689 v4 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-2689 v4 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-11500 versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-2689 v4 — a 19% clock advantage for the Core i5-11500 (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i5-11500 uses the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2689 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-11500 scores 17,096 against the Xeon E5-2689 v4's 17,084 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i5-11500. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-11500 vs 25 MB on the Xeon E5-2689 v4.
| Feature | Core i5-11500 | Xeon E5-2689 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 10 / 20+67% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+21% | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz | 3.1 GHz+15% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 25 MB+108% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core)+10140% | 2.5 MB |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Rocket Lake (2021) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 17,096 | 17,084 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,883 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,064 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 8,564 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-11500 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2689 v4 uses LGA2011-3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-11500 | Xeon E5-2689 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | LGA2011-3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-11500) / not specified (Xeon E5-2689 v4). The Core i5-11500 includes integrated graphics (UHD 750), while the Xeon E5-2689 v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-11500 targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-11500 rivals Ryzen 5 5600X.
| Feature | Core i5-11500 | Xeon E5-2689 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD 750 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-11500 was priced at $192, while the Xeon E5-2689 v4 came in at $2723. On launch pricing ($192 vs $2723), Core i5-11500 was $2531 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-11500 delivers 89.0 pts/$ vs 6.3 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2689 v4 — making the Core i5-11500 the 173.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-11500 | Xeon E5-2689 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $192-93% | $2723 |
| Performance per Dollar | 89.0+1313% | 6.3 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2016 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














