Core i5-11500 vs Xeon E5-4669 v3

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-11500 vs Xeon E5-4669 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-11500 vs Xeon E5-4669 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-11500

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 135W, a 70W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD 750, while Xeon E5-4669 v3 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E5-4669 v3.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (17,096 vs 17,430).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 45 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4669 v3, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $192 MSRP, while Xeon E5-4669 v3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-4669 v3

2015

Why buy it

✅+2% higher PassMark.
✅+275% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads.

Trade-offs

❌107.7% higher power demand at 135W vs 65W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-11500 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-11500.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-11500 better than Xeon E5-4669 v3?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-4669 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-11500 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-4669 v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2% better PassMark, backed by 18 cores and 36 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 275% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-11500 is the better buy right now. Core i5-11500 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $192 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5-4669 v3 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 2% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (89.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-11500 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2015) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-11500 vs Xeon E5-4669 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-11500

The Core i5-11500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 17,096 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-4669 v3

The Xeon E5-4669 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,430 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-11500 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-4669 v3 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon E5-4669 v3 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-11500 versus 2.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-4669 v3 — a 45.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-11500 (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i5-11500 uses the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-4669 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-11500 scores 17,096 against the Xeon E5-4669 v3's 17,430 — a 1.9% lead for the Xeon E5-4669 v3. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-11500 vs 45 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-4669 v3.

Feature	Core i5-11500	Xeon E5-4669 v3
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	18 / 36+200%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+59%	2.9 GHz
Base Clock	2.7 GHz+29%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	45 MB (total)+275%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Rocket Lake (2021)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	17,096	17,430+2%
Cinebench R23 Multi	9,883	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,064	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	8,564	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-11500 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-4669 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-11500	Xeon E5-4669 v3
Socket	LGA1200	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-11500) / not specified (Xeon E5-4669 v3). The Core i5-11500 includes integrated graphics (UHD 750), while the Xeon E5-4669 v3 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-11500 targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-11500 rivals Ryzen 5 5600X.