
Core i5-11500B
Popular choices:

Core Ultra 5 135U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-11500B
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.4% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $185 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 135U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA1787 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 135U moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
Core Ultra 5 135U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1787 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-11500B across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,900 vs 17,075).
Core i5-11500B
2021Core Ultra 5 135U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.4% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Why buy it
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1787 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $185 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 135U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA1787 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 135U moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-11500B across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,900 vs 17,075).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-11500B better than Core Ultra 5 135U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-11500B | Core Ultra 5 135U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-11500B | Core Ultra 5 135U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 394 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 283 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 352 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 263 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 291 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 243 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 101 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-11500B | Core Ultra 5 135U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 427 FPS | 422 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 422 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 422 FPS |
| ultra | 427 FPS | 422 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 427 FPS | 422 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 422 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 422 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 422 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 427 FPS | 422 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 320 FPS | 334 FPS |
| ultra | 252 FPS | 266 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-11500B | Core Ultra 5 135U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 427 FPS | 422 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 422 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 422 FPS |
| ultra | 427 FPS | 422 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 427 FPS | 422 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 422 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 422 FPS |
| ultra | 427 FPS | 422 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 427 FPS | 422 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 422 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 422 FPS | 367 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-11500B and Core Ultra 5 135U

Core i5-11500B
Core i5-11500B
The Core i5-11500B is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB. L2 cache: 7.5 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,075 points. Launch price was $299.

Core Ultra 5 135U
Core Ultra 5 135U
The Core Ultra 5 135U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-P (2023) architecture. It features 12 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 12 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 16,900 points. Launch price was $332.
Processing Power
The Core i5-11500B packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 135U offers 12 cores / 14 threads — the Core Ultra 5 135U has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-11500B versus 4.4 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 135U — a 4.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-11500B (base: 3.3 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Core i5-11500B uses the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 135U uses Meteor Lake-P (2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-11500B scores 17,075 against the Core Ultra 5 135U's 16,900 — a 1% lead for the Core i5-11500B. L3 cache: 12 MB on the Core i5-11500B vs 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 135U.
| Feature | Core i5-11500B | Core Ultra 5 135U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 12 / 14+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+5% | 4.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+106% | 1.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 7.5 MB+275% | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 7 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Tiger Lake-H (2021) | Meteor Lake-P (2023) |
| PassMark | 17,075+1% | 16,900 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 9,315 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,948 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 8,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-11500B uses the FCBGA1787 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 5 135U uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-11500B versus DDR5-5600 on the Core Ultra 5 135U — the Core Ultra 5 135U supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-11500B supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 96 GB — 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes.
| Feature | Core i5-11500B | Core Ultra 5 135U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1787 | FCBGA2049 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-5600+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+33% | 96 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i5-11500B supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-11500B) vs Yes (Core Ultra 5 135U). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 32EU (Core i5-11500B) and Intel Arc Graphics (Core Ultra 5 135U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-11500B targets Desktop / Mini PC.
| Feature | Core i5-11500B | Core Ultra 5 135U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 32EU | Intel Arc Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | Yes |
| Target Use | Desktop / Mini PC | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












