
Core i5-11500B

Xeon E-2378
Core i5-11500B vs Xeon E-2378 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-11500B vs Xeon E-2378 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-11500B vs Xeon E-2378: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-11500B
2021Why buy it
- ✅+0% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $177 less on MSRP ($185 MSRP vs $362 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 95.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 92.3 vs 47.2 PassMark/$ ($185 MSRP vs $362 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 65W, a 58W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 32EU, while Xeon E-2378 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2378 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E-2378, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
Xeon E-2378
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,069 vs 17,075).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 47.2 vs 92.3 PassMark/$ ($362 MSRP vs $185 MSRP).
- ❌766.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 7.5W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-11500B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-11500B better than Xeon E-2378?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-11500B vs Xeon E-2378 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-11500B
The Core i5-11500B is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB. L2 cache: 7.5 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,075 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E-2378
The Xeon E-2378 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 17,069 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i5-11500B packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E-2378 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E-2378 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-11500B versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon E-2378 — a 4.3% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2378 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i5-11500B uses the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon E-2378 uses Rocket Lake-E (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-11500B scores 17,075 against the Xeon E-2378's 17,069 — a 0% lead for the Core i5-11500B. L3 cache: 12 MB on the Core i5-11500B vs 16 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2378.
| Feature | Core i5-11500B | Xeon E-2378 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 4.8 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+27% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB | 16 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 7.5 MB | 512K (per core)+6727% |
| Process | 10 nm-29% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Tiger Lake-H (2021) | Rocket Lake-E (2021) |
| PassMark | 17,075 | 17,069 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,821 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 9,986 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-11500B uses the FCBGA1787 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E-2378 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes.
| Feature | Core i5-11500B | Xeon E-2378 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1787 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-11500B) vs Yes (Xeon E-2378). The Core i5-11500B includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 32EU), while the Xeon E-2378 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-11500B targets Desktop / Mini PC.
| Feature | Core i5-11500B | Xeon E-2378 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 32EU | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | Yes |
| Target Use | Desktop / Mini PC | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-11500B was priced at $185, while the Xeon E-2378 came in at $362. On launch pricing ($185 vs $362), Core i5-11500B was $177 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-11500B delivers 92.3 pts/$ vs 47.2 pts/$ for the Xeon E-2378 — making the Core i5-11500B the 64.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-11500B | Xeon E-2378 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $185-49% | $362 |
| Performance per Dollar | 92.3+96% | 47.2 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2021 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














