Core i5-11500B vs Xeon E5-2680 v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-11500B vs Xeon E5-2680 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-11500B vs Xeon E5-2680 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-11500B

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 8W instead of 120W, a 113W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 32EU, while Xeon E5-2680 v4 needs a discrete GPU.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (17,075 vs 17,292).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 35 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2680 v4, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
❌Launch MSRP is still $185 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2680 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-2680 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
✅+191.7% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌1500% higher power demand at 120W vs 7.5W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-11500B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-11500B better than Xeon E5-2680 v4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2680 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-11500B is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2680 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 28 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 191.7% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-11500B is the better buy right now. Core i5-11500B comes in at an unclear MSRP at $185 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2680 v4 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.3% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (92.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-11500B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2016) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-11500B vs Xeon E5-2680 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-11500B

The Core i5-11500B is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB. L2 cache: 7.5 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,075 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-2680 v4

The Xeon E5-2680 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-EP (2016) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 35 MB. L2 cache: 3.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 17,292 points. Launch price was $1,745.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-11500B packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2680 v4 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon E5-2680 v4 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-11500B versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2680 v4 — a 32.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-11500B (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i5-11500B uses the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon E5-2680 v4 uses Broadwell-EP (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-11500B scores 17,075 against the Xeon E5-2680 v4's 17,292 — a 1.3% lead for the Xeon E5-2680 v4. L3 cache: 12 MB on the Core i5-11500B vs 35 MB on the Xeon E5-2680 v4.

Feature	Core i5-11500B	Xeon E5-2680 v4
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	14 / 28+133%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+39%	3.3 GHz
Base Clock	3.3 GHz+38%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB	35 MB+192%
L2 Cache	7.5 MB+114%	3.5 MB
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Tiger Lake-H (2021)	Broadwell-EP (2016)
PassMark	17,075	17,292+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-11500B uses the FCBGA1787 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2680 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-11500B versus 2400 on the Xeon E5-2680 v4 — the Core i5-11500B supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2680 v4 supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 1100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-11500B) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2680 v4). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-11500B) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2680 v4) — the Xeon E5-2680 v4 offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Core i5-11500B	Xeon E5-2680 v4
Socket	FCBGA1787	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200+33%	2400
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	1536 GB+1100%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	40+100%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Core i5-11500B supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i5-11500B includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 32EU), while the Xeon E5-2680 v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-11500B targets Desktop / Mini PC. Direct competitor: Xeon E5-2680 v4 rivals Xeon Silver 4114.