Core i5-11600KF vs Core Ultra 7 256V

The Core i5-11600KF packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 256V offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Core Ultra 7 256V has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i5-11600KF versus 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 256V — a 2.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-11600KF (base: 3.9 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i5-11600KF uses the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 256V uses Lunar Lake (2024) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-11600KF scores 19,468 against the Core Ultra 7 256V's 19,579 — a 0.6% lead for the Core Ultra 7 256V. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 11,277 vs 10,065 (11.4% advantage for the Core i5-11600KF). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,138 vs 2,658, a 21.7% lead for the Core Ultra 7 256V that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 8,631 vs 11,000 (24.1% advantage for the Core Ultra 7 256V). Both processors carry 12 MB (total) of L3 cache.

The Core i5-11600KF uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 7 256V uses FCBGA2833 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-11600KF versus LPDDR5x 8533 MT/s on the Core Ultra 7 256V — the Core Ultra 7 256V supports 166.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-11600KF supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-11600KF) vs 8 (Core Ultra 7 256V) — the Core i5-11600KF offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: LGA1200 (Core i5-11600KF) and Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 7 256V).

Only the Core i5-11600KF has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Core i5-11600KF supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-11600KF) vs true (Core Ultra 7 256V). The Core Ultra 7 256V includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics 140V), while the Core i5-11600KF requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-11600KF targets Gaming, Core Ultra 7 256V targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Core i5-11600KF rivals Ryzen 5 5600X.

At launch, the Core i5-11600KF was priced at $237, while the Core Ultra 7 256V came in at $450. On launch pricing ($237 vs $450), Core i5-11600KF was $213 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-11600KF delivers 82.1 pts/$ vs 43.5 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 7 256V — making the Core i5-11600KF the 61.5% better value option.

Search Core i5-11600KF on AmazonSearch Core Ultra 7 256V on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.