Core i5-11600KF vs Xeon W-1350P

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-11600KF vs Xeon W-1350P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-11600KF vs Xeon W-1350P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-11600KF

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +22.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $74 less on MSRP ($237 MSRP vs $311 MSRP).
✅Delivers 30.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 82.1 vs 63.1 PassMark/$ ($237 MSRP vs $311 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (19,468 vs 19,611).

Xeon W-1350P

2021

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-11600KF across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 63.1 vs 82.1 PassMark/$ ($311 MSRP vs $237 MSRP).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-1350P better than Core i5-11600KF?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W-1350P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-11600KF is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-1350P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-1350P is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-11600KF is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon W-1350P comes in 31.2% more expensive on MSRP at $311 MSRP versus $237 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i5-11600KF is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 22.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-11600KF is also 30.3% better value on MSRP (82.1 vs 63.1 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-1350P is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Core i5-11600KF vs Xeon W-1350P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-11600KF

The Core i5-11600KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,468 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-1350P

The Xeon W-1350P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,611 points. Launch price was $311.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-11600KF and Xeon W-1350P share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i5-11600KF versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon W-1350P — a 4% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1350P (base: 3.9 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Core i5-11600KF uses the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W-1350P uses Rocket Lake-S (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-11600KF scores 19,468 against the Xeon W-1350P's 19,611 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon W-1350P. Both processors carry 12 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i5-11600KF	Xeon W-1350P
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz	5.1 GHz+4%
Base Clock	3.9 GHz	4 GHz+3%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	12 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Rocket Lake (2021)	Rocket Lake-S (2021)
PassMark	19,468	19,611
Cinebench R23 Multi	11,277	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,138	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	8,631	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1200 socket with PCIe 4.0.

Feature	Core i5-11600KF	Xeon W-1350P
Socket	LGA1200	LGA1200
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-11600KF) / not specified (Xeon W-1350P). Primary use case: Core i5-11600KF targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-11600KF rivals Ryzen 5 5600X.

Feature	Core i5-11600KF	Xeon W-1350P
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	Yes	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	—
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-11600KF was priced at $237, while the Xeon W-1350P came in at $311. On launch pricing ($237 vs $311), Core i5-11600KF was $74 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-11600KF delivers 82.1 pts/$ vs 63.1 pts/$ for the Xeon W-1350P — making the Core i5-11600KF the 26.3% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-11600KF	Xeon W-1350P
MSRP	$237-24%	$311
Performance per Dollar	82.1+30%	63.1
Release Date	2021	2021

Search Core i5-11600KF on Amazon

Search Xeon W-1350P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.