
Core i5-12400
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 5600F
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12400
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.3% higher average FPS across 44 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 730, while Ryzen 5 5600F needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 5600F.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,794 vs 20,225).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 89.9 vs 204.3 PassMark/$ ($209 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
Ryzen 5 5600F
2025Why buy it
- ✅+7.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Costs $110 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $209 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 127.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 204.3 vs 89.9 PassMark/$ ($99 MSRP vs $209 MSRP).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400 across 44 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i5-12400 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-12400 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400.
Core i5-12400
2022Ryzen 5 5600F
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.3% higher average FPS across 44 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 730, while Ryzen 5 5600F needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 5600F.
Why buy it
- ✅+7.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Costs $110 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $209 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 127.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 204.3 vs 89.9 PassMark/$ ($99 MSRP vs $209 MSRP).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,794 vs 20,225).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 89.9 vs 204.3 PassMark/$ ($209 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400 across 44 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i5-12400 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-12400 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5600F better than Core i5-12400?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400 | Ryzen 5 5600F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400 | Ryzen 5 5600F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 323 FPS |
| medium | 397 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 177 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 351 FPS | 242 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 265 FPS | 160 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 116 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12400 | Ryzen 5 5600F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 493 FPS |
| high | 470 FPS | 451 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 388 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 412 FPS |
| high | 470 FPS | 374 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 322 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 357 FPS |
| medium | 389 FPS | 289 FPS |
| high | 337 FPS | 247 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 192 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12400 | Ryzen 5 5600F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 506 FPS |
| high | 470 FPS | 506 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 506 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 506 FPS |
| high | 470 FPS | 503 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 430 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 452 FPS |
| medium | 450 FPS | 406 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 362 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 309 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400 and Ryzen 5 5600F

Core i5-12400
Core i5-12400
The Core i5-12400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 18,794 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 5 5600F
Ryzen 5 5600F
The Ryzen 5 5600F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 September 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,225 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-12400 and Ryzen 5 5600F share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400 versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600F — a 9.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i5-12400 uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600F uses Vermeer (2020−2025) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400 scores 18,794 against the Ryzen 5 5600F's 20,225 — a 7.3% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600F. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5600F.
| Feature | Core i5-12400 | Ryzen 5 5600F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+10% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3 GHz+20% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 32 MB (total)+78% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Vermeer (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 18,794 | 20,225+8% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,400 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,381 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,632 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12400 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600F uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-12400 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 5600F — the Core i5-12400 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-12400) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 5600F) — the Ryzen 5 5600F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core i5-12400 | Ryzen 5 5600F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 24+20% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600F). The Core i5-12400 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 730), while the Ryzen 5 5600F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-12400 targets Gaming Performance/Value, Ryzen 5 5600F targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400 rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Core i5-12400 | Ryzen 5 5600F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 730 | — |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-12400 launched at $209 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 5600F debuted at $99. On MSRP ($209 vs $99), the Ryzen 5 5600F is $110 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-12400 delivers 89.9 pts/$ vs 204.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 5600F — making the Ryzen 5 5600F the 77.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-12400 | Ryzen 5 5600F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $209 | $99-53% |
| Performance per Dollar | 89.9 | 204.3+127% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











