
Core i5-12400F
Popular choices:

Core i5-12500H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-12500H.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,700 vs 2,260).
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (657 vs 9,900).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Core i5-12500H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-12500H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-12500H
2022Why buy it
- ✅+32.9% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU, while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Core i5-12400F
2022Core i5-12500H
2022Why buy it
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-12500H.
Why buy it
- ✅+32.9% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU, while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,700 vs 2,260).
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (657 vs 9,900).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Core i5-12500H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-12500H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-12500H better than Core i5-12400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Core i5-12500H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Core i5-12500H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 512 FPS |
| medium | 397 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 406 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 477 FPS |
| medium | 351 FPS | 421 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 361 FPS |
| ultra | 265 FPS | 316 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 216 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Core i5-12500H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 512 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 512 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 477 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 420 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 512 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 427 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 449 FPS |
| medium | 389 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 337 FPS | 327 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 267 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Core i5-12500H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 512 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 512 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 512 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 512 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 512 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 512 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 512 FPS |
| ultra | 473 FPS | 492 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 507 FPS |
| medium | 450 FPS | 463 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 414 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 361 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Core i5-12500H

Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Core i5-12500H
Core i5-12500H
The Core i5-12500H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-H (2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,462 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i5-12500H offers 12 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-12500H has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 4.5 GHz on the Core i5-12500H — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-12500H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i5-12500H uses Alder Lake-H (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Core i5-12500H's 20,462 — a 4.7% lead for the Core i5-12500H. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,700 vs 2,260, a 28.3% lead for the Core i5-12500H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 657 vs 9,900 (175.1% advantage for the Core i5-12500H). Both processors carry 18 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core i5-12500H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 12 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.5 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 18 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Alder Lake-H (2022) |
| PassMark | 19,532 | 20,462+5% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700 | 2,260+33% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | 9,900+1407% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-12500H uses FCBGA1744 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Core i5-12400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F) and Adler Lake-H PCH (Core i5-12500H).
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core i5-12500H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FCBGA1744 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+100% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-12500H). The Core i5-12500H includes integrated graphics (Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU), while the Core i5-12400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value, Core i5-12500H targets Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core i5-12500H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | Performance Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












