Core i5-12400F vs Core Ultra 7 268V

Intel

Core i5-12400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2022
Core family
·······
VS
Intel

Core Ultra 7 268V

8 Cores8 Thrd17 WWMax: 5 GHz2024
Core Ultra family
·······

Core i5-12400F vs Core Ultra 7 268V Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-12400F vs Core Ultra 7 268V FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-12400F vs Core Ultra 7 268V: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Why buy it

  • +16.2% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
  • +50% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 12 MB).
  • Costs $276 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
  • Delivers 156.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 43.8 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
  • 150% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 268V across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • 282.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 17W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 7 268V can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core Ultra 7 268V

2024

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +4.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 17W instead of 65W, a 48W reduction.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Arc Graphics 140V, while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (10,653 vs 12,380).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 18 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 43.8 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($450 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 7 268V better than Core i5-12400F?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core Ultra 7 268V is ahead with a 4.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-12400F pulls ahead with 16.2% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Core i5-12400F also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 12 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-12400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 16.2% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 12 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core Ultra 7 268V is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-12400F is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core Ultra 7 268V comes in 158.6% more expensive on MSRP at $450 MSRP versus $174 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i5-12400F is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 16.2% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Core i5-12400F is also 156.4% better value on MSRP (112.3 vs 43.8 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 7 268V makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-12400F vs Core Ultra 7 268V Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i5-12400F

The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Intel

Core Ultra 7 268V

The Core Ultra 7 268V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,698 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 268V offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Core Ultra 7 268V has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 5 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 268V — a 12.8% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 268V (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 268V uses Lunar Lake (2024) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Core Ultra 7 268V's 19,698 — a 0.8% lead for the Core Ultra 7 268V. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 12,380 vs 10,653 (15% advantage for the Core i5-12400F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,700 vs 2,437, a 35.6% lead for the Core Ultra 7 268V that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 657 vs 10,000 (175.3% advantage for the Core Ultra 7 268V). L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 268V.

FeatureCore i5-12400FCore Ultra 7 268V
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
8 / 8+33%
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz
5 GHz+14%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz+14%
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
18 MB (total)+50%
12 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
2.5 MB (per core)+100%
Process
Intel 7 nm
3 nm-57%
Architecture
Alder Lake-S (2022)
Lunar Lake (2024)
PassMark
19,532
19,698
Cinebench R23 Multi
12,380+16%
10,653
Geekbench 6 Single
1,700
2,437+43%
Geekbench 6 Multi
657
10,000+1422%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core Ultra 7 268V uses FCBGA2833 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-12400F versus LPDDR5x-8533 on the Core Ultra 7 268V — the Core Ultra 7 268V supports 77.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-12400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-12400F) vs 8 (Core Ultra 7 268V) — the Core i5-12400F offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F) and SoC (Core Ultra 7 268V).

FeatureCore i5-12400FCore Ultra 7 268V
Socket
LGA1700
FCBGA2833
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
LPDDR5x-8533+78%
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB+300%
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
20+150%
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. The Core Ultra 7 268V includes integrated graphics (Arc Graphics 140V), while the Core i5-12400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value, Core Ultra 7 268V targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600; Core Ultra 7 268V rivals Core Ultra 7 155H.

FeatureCore i5-12400FCore Ultra 7 268V
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Arc Graphics 140V
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Gaming Performance/Value
Productivity
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-12400F was priced at $174, while the Core Ultra 7 268V came in at $450. On launch pricing ($174 vs $450), Core i5-12400F was $276 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-12400F delivers 112.3 pts/$ vs 43.8 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 7 268V — making the Core i5-12400F the 87.8% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-12400FCore Ultra 7 268V
MSRP
$174-61%
$450
Performance per Dollar
112.3+156%
43.8
Release Date
2022
2024

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.