Core i5-12400F vs Core i5-13400

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $47 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $221 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-13400.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 23,769).

Core i5-13400

2023

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌
27% HIGHER MSRP
$221 MSRPvs$174 MSRP
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Core i5-13400

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $47 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $221 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-13400.

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 23,769).

Trade-offs

❌
27% HIGHER MSRP
$221 MSRPvs$174 MSRP
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400 better than Core i5-12400F?

Yes. Core i5-13400 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 2.9% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 21.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 2.9% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400 is the better fit. You are getting 21.7% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400 is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-12400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Core i5-13400 is 27.0% more expensive on MSRP at $221 MSRP versus $174 MSRP, and it gives you a 2.9% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-12400F is also 4.4% better value on MSRP (112.3 vs 107.6 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022) and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-12400F Benchmark Check

Core i5-13400 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-12400F	Core i5-13400
1080p
low	183 FPS	171 FPS
medium	168 FPS	158 FPS
high	139 FPS	132 FPS
ultra	119 FPS	112 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	143 FPS
medium	132 FPS	123 FPS
high	106 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	89 FPS	84 FPS
4K
low	87 FPS	81 FPS
medium	81 FPS	74 FPS
high	64 FPS	59 FPS
ultra	49 FPS	46 FPS

Open Core i5-12400F Open Core i5-13400

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-12400F	Core i5-13400
1080p
low	471 FPS	545 FPS
medium	397 FPS	464 FPS
high	341 FPS	389 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	356 FPS
1440p
low	407 FPS	458 FPS
medium	351 FPS	403 FPS
high	309 FPS	345 FPS
ultra	265 FPS	301 FPS
4K
low	282 FPS	280 FPS
medium	248 FPS	247 FPS
high	229 FPS	231 FPS
ultra	196 FPS	204 FPS

Open Core i5-12400F Open Core i5-13400

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-12400F	Core i5-13400
1080p
low	488 FPS	530 FPS
medium	488 FPS	449 FPS
high	488 FPS	415 FPS
ultra	488 FPS	375 FPS
1440p
low	488 FPS	490 FPS
medium	488 FPS	422 FPS
high	485 FPS	382 FPS
ultra	434 FPS	343 FPS
4K
low	442 FPS	393 FPS
medium	389 FPS	331 FPS
high	337 FPS	296 FPS
ultra	274 FPS	246 FPS

Open Core i5-12400F Open Core i5-13400

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-12400F	Core i5-13400
1080p
low	488 FPS	594 FPS
medium	488 FPS	594 FPS
high	488 FPS	594 FPS
ultra	488 FPS	594 FPS
1440p
low	488 FPS	594 FPS
medium	488 FPS	594 FPS
high	488 FPS	594 FPS
ultra	473 FPS	521 FPS
4K
low	488 FPS	535 FPS
medium	450 FPS	492 FPS
high	391 FPS	439 FPS
ultra	330 FPS	382 FPS

Open Core i5-12400F Open Core i5-13400

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Core i5-13400

Core i5-12400F

The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Core i5-13400

The Core i5-13400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 23,769 points. Launch price was $221.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i5-13400 offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400 — a 4.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i5-13400 uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Core i5-13400's 23,769 — a 19.6% lead for the Core i5-13400. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400.

Feature	Core i5-12400F	Core i5-13400
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	10 / 16+67%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz	4.6 GHz+5%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	18 MB (total)	20 MB (total)+11%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	1.25 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake-S (2022)	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark	19,532	23,769+22%
Cinebench R23 Multi	12,380	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,700	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	657	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 3.0.

Feature	Core i5-12400F	Core i5-13400
Socket	LGA1700	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) / not specified (Core i5-13400). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.

Feature	Core i5-12400F	Core i5-13400
Integrated GPU	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	—
Target Use	Gaming Performance/Value	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-12400F launched at $174 MSRP, while the Core i5-13400 debuted at $221. On MSRP ($174 vs $221), the Core i5-12400F is $47 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-12400F delivers 112.3 pts/$ vs 107.6 pts/$ for the Core i5-13400 — making the Core i5-12400F the 4.3% better value option.