
Core i5-12400F
Popular choices:

Core i5-13500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $68 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $242 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13500 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (12,380 vs 20,924).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 112.3 vs 128.5 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $242 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13500 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-13500
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Delivers 14.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 128.5 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($242 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌39.1% HIGHER MSRP$242 MSRPvs$174 MSRP
Core i5-12400F
2022Core i5-13500
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $68 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $242 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Delivers 14.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 128.5 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($242 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13500 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (12,380 vs 20,924).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 112.3 vs 128.5 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $242 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13500 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌39.1% HIGHER MSRP$242 MSRPvs$174 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13500 better than Core i5-12400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Core i5-13500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 250 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 208 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Core i5-13500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 556 FPS |
| medium | 397 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 400 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 368 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 458 FPS |
| medium | 351 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 350 FPS |
| ultra | 265 FPS | 306 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 281 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 248 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 208 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Core i5-13500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 648 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 527 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 467 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 405 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 590 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 486 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 425 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 370 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 433 FPS |
| medium | 389 FPS | 372 FPS |
| high | 337 FPS | 333 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 285 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Core i5-13500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 778 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 778 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 726 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 644 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 778 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 702 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 608 FPS |
| ultra | 473 FPS | 528 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 555 FPS |
| medium | 450 FPS | 504 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 449 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 390 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Core i5-13500

Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Core i5-13500
Core i5-13500
The Core i5-13500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,109 points. Launch price was $242.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i5-13500 offers 14 cores / 20 threads — the Core i5-13500 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 4.8 GHz on the Core i5-13500 — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-13500 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i5-13500 uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Core i5-13500's 31,109 — a 45.7% lead for the Core i5-13500. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 12,380 vs 20,924 (51.3% advantage for the Core i5-13500). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,700 vs 2,419, a 34.9% lead for the Core i5-13500 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 657 vs 12,160 (179.5% advantage for the Core i5-13500). L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 24 MB (total) on the Core i5-13500.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core i5-13500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 14 / 20+133% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.8 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 24 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 19,532 | 31,109+59% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | 20,924+69% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700 | 2,419+42% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | 12,160+1751% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 3.0. Both support up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Core i5-13500 supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F) and Z790,B760,Z690,B660 (Core i5-13500).
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core i5-13500 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 192 GB+50% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. The Core i5-13500 includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Core i5-12400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value, Core i5-13500 targets High-end Productivity / Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600; Core i5-13500 rivals Ryzen 7 7700.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core i5-13500 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | High-end Productivity / Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-12400F launched at $174 MSRP, while the Core i5-13500 debuted at $242. On MSRP ($174 vs $242), the Core i5-12400F is $68 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-12400F delivers 112.3 pts/$ vs 128.5 pts/$ for the Core i5-13500 — making the Core i5-13500 the 13.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core i5-13500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $174-28% | $242 |
| Performance per Dollar | 112.3 | 128.5+14% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












