
Core i5-12400F
Popular choices:

Core i5-14450HX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-14450HX.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 23,557).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Core i5-14450HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-14450HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-14450HX
2024Why buy it
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics, while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Core i5-12400F
2022Core i5-14450HX
2024Why buy it
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-14450HX.
Why buy it
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics, while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 23,557).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Core i5-14450HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-14450HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-14450HX better than Core i5-12400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Core i5-14450HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 252 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 242 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Core i5-14450HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 555 FPS |
| medium | 397 FPS | 470 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 393 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 361 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 457 FPS |
| medium | 351 FPS | 402 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 345 FPS |
| ultra | 265 FPS | 300 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 279 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 231 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 203 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Core i5-14450HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 589 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 526 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 466 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 404 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 588 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 423 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 369 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 433 FPS |
| medium | 389 FPS | 371 FPS |
| high | 337 FPS | 333 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 284 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Core i5-14450HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 589 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 589 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 589 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 589 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 589 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 589 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 588 FPS |
| ultra | 473 FPS | 512 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 531 FPS |
| medium | 450 FPS | 486 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 434 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 378 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Core i5-14450HX

Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Core i5-14450HX
Core i5-14450HX
The Core i5-14450HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): + 20 MB. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,557 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i5-14450HX offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-14450HX has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 4.8 GHz on the Core i5-14450HX — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-14450HX (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i5-14450HX uses Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Core i5-14450HX's 23,557 — a 18.7% lead for the Core i5-14450HX. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-14450HX.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core i5-14450HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 10 / 16+67% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.8 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+4% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 20 MB (total)+11% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+60% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024) |
| PassMark | 19,532 | 23,557+21% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-14450HX uses FCBGA1964 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Core i5-14450HX supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core i5-14450HX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FCBGA1964 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 192 GB+50% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-14450HX). The Core i5-14450HX includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics), while the Core i5-12400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value, Core i5-14450HX targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core i5-14450HX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel UHD Graphics |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | Mobile |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












