
Core i5-12400F
Popular choices:

Core i7-1180G7
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +135.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1598 and DDR4.
- ✅400% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-1180G7.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Core i7-1180G7 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌622.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 9W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-1180G7 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-1180G7
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 9W instead of 65W, a 56W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,788 vs 19,532).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 18 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA1598 with DDR4, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Core i5-12400F
2022Core i7-1180G7
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +135.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1598 and DDR4.
- ✅400% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-1180G7.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 9W instead of 65W, a 56W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Core i7-1180G7 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌622.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 9W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-1180G7 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,788 vs 19,532).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 18 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA1598 with DDR4, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-12400F better than Core i7-1180G7?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Core i7-1180G7 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Core i7-1180G7 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 178 FPS |
| medium | 397 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 351 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 265 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 71 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Core i7-1180G7 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 195 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 195 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 195 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 195 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 195 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 195 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 389 FPS | 195 FPS |
| high | 337 FPS | 195 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 195 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Core i7-1180G7 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 195 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 195 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 195 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 195 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 195 FPS |
| ultra | 473 FPS | 195 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 450 FPS | 195 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 195 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 195 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Core i7-1180G7

Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Core i7-1180G7
Core i7-1180G7
The Core i7-1180G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 31 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1598. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,788 points. Launch price was $426.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i7-1180G7 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i5-12400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i7-1180G7 — a 4.4% clock advantage for the Core i7-1180G7 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i7-1180G7 uses Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) (10 nm SuperFin). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Core i7-1180G7's 7,788 — a 86% lead for the Core i5-12400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,700 vs 1,845, a 8.2% lead for the Core i7-1180G7 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-1180G7.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core i7-1180G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+50% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.6 GHz+5% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+92% | 1.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total)+50% | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-30% | 10 nm SuperFin |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) |
| PassMark | 19,532+151% | 7,788 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700 | 1,845+9% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-1180G7 uses FCBGA1598 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-12400F versus LPDDR4x-4267 on the Core i7-1180G7 — the Core i5-12400F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-12400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-12400F) vs 4 (Core i7-1180G7) — the Core i5-12400F offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F) and Tiger Lake-UP4 (Core i7-1180G7).
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core i7-1180G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FCBGA1598 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+25% | LPDDR4x-4267 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+300% | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20+400% | 4 |
Advanced Features
Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. The Core i7-1180G7 includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics 96EU), while the Core i5-12400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value, Core i7-1180G7 targets Premium Ultra-Thin Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600; Core i7-1180G7 rivals Ryzen 7 5800U.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core i7-1180G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Iris Xe Graphics 96EU |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | Premium Ultra-Thin Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












