
Core i5-12400F
Popular choices:

Core i7-12700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $76 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,700 vs 2,497).
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (12,380 vs 21,568).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-12700 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-12700
2022Why buy it
- ✅+46.9% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅+38.9% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌43.7% HIGHER MSRP$250 MSRPvs$174 MSRP
Core i5-12400F
2022Core i7-12700
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $76 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅+46.9% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅+38.9% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,700 vs 2,497).
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (12,380 vs 21,568).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-12700 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌43.7% HIGHER MSRP$250 MSRPvs$174 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-12700 better than Core i5-12400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Core i7-12700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 257 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 248 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 207 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 177 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 194 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 91 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Core i7-12700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 312 FPS |
| medium | 397 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 204 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 257 FPS |
| medium | 351 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 265 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 118 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Core i7-12700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 751 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 610 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 540 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 458 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 547 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 479 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 411 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 389 FPS | 412 FPS |
| high | 337 FPS | 369 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 311 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Core i7-12700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 751 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 751 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 664 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 590 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 730 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 651 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 560 FPS |
| ultra | 473 FPS | 487 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 513 FPS |
| medium | 450 FPS | 468 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 414 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 360 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Core i7-12700

Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Core i7-12700
Core i7-12700
The Core i7-12700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 30,055 points. Launch price was $349.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i7-12700 offers 12 cores / 20 threads — the Core i7-12700 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-12700 — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-12700 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). Both are built on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture using a Intel 7 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Core i7-12700's 30,055 — a 42.4% lead for the Core i7-12700. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 12,380 vs 21,568 (54.1% advantage for the Core i7-12700). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,700 vs 2,497, a 38% lead for the Core i7-12700 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 657 vs 12,448 (179.9% advantage for the Core i7-12700). L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 25 MB (total) on the Core i7-12700.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core i7-12700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 12 / 20+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.9 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+19% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 25 MB (total)+39% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
| PassMark | 19,532 | 30,055+54% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | 21,568+74% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700 | 2,497+47% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | 12,448+1795% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 3.0. Both support up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,Z790 (Core i7-12700).
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core i7-12700 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | DDR5-4800 / DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) vs VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Core i7-12700). The Core i7-12700 includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Core i5-12400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value, Core i7-12700 targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600; Core i7-12700 rivals Ryzen 7 5700X.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core i7-12700 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x / VT-d / EPT |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-12400F launched at $174 MSRP, while the Core i7-12700 debuted at $250. On MSRP ($174 vs $250), the Core i5-12400F is $76 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-12400F delivers 112.3 pts/$ vs 120.2 pts/$ for the Core i7-12700 — making the Core i7-12700 the 6.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core i7-12700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $174-30% | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 112.3 | 120.2+7% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












