PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.7% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-12800HX.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (12,380 vs 18,680).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Core i7-12800HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-12800HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-12800HX

2022

Why buy it

✅+50.9% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅+38.9% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 18 MB).
✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Core i7-12800HX

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.7% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-12800HX.

Why buy it

✅+50.9% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅+38.9% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 18 MB).
✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (12,380 vs 18,680).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Core i7-12800HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-12800HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-12800HX better than Core i5-12400F?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Core i5-12400F is ahead with a 6.7% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-12800HX pulls ahead with 50.9% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Core i7-12800HX also has the bigger cache pool with 38.9% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 18 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-12800HX is the better fit. You are getting 50.9% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 38.9% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 18 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-12800HX is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-12400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Core i7-12800HX is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $174 MSRP, and it gives you 50.9% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. The trade-off is that Core i5-12400F is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 6.7% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-12400F is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (112.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-12800HX is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 38.9% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 18 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 24 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-12400F Benchmark Check

Core i7-12800HX Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-12400F	Core i7-12800HX
1080p
low	183 FPS	269 FPS
medium	168 FPS	259 FPS
high	139 FPS	214 FPS
ultra	119 FPS	184 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	230 FPS
medium	132 FPS	198 FPS
high	106 FPS	159 FPS
ultra	89 FPS	140 FPS
4K
low	87 FPS	159 FPS
medium	81 FPS	136 FPS
high	64 FPS	106 FPS
ultra	49 FPS	93 FPS

Open Core i5-12400F Open Core i7-12800HX

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-12400F	Core i7-12800HX
1080p
low	471 FPS	313 FPS
medium	397 FPS	265 FPS
high	341 FPS	224 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	205 FPS
1440p
low	407 FPS	258 FPS
medium	351 FPS	228 FPS
high	309 FPS	199 FPS
ultra	265 FPS	173 FPS
4K
low	282 FPS	159 FPS
medium	248 FPS	142 FPS
high	229 FPS	135 FPS
ultra	196 FPS	120 FPS

Open Core i5-12400F Open Core i7-12800HX

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-12400F	Core i7-12800HX
1080p
low	488 FPS	775 FPS
medium	488 FPS	616 FPS
high	488 FPS	545 FPS
ultra	488 FPS	462 FPS
1440p
low	488 FPS	692 FPS
medium	488 FPS	554 FPS
high	485 FPS	485 FPS
ultra	434 FPS	416 FPS
4K
low	442 FPS	498 FPS
medium	389 FPS	416 FPS
high	337 FPS	373 FPS
ultra	274 FPS	314 FPS

Open Core i5-12400F Open Core i7-12800HX

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-12400F	Core i7-12800HX
1080p
low	488 FPS	781 FPS
medium	488 FPS	781 FPS
high	488 FPS	672 FPS
ultra	488 FPS	597 FPS
1440p
low	488 FPS	742 FPS
medium	488 FPS	658 FPS
high	488 FPS	566 FPS
ultra	473 FPS	493 FPS
4K
low	488 FPS	522 FPS
medium	450 FPS	473 FPS
high	391 FPS	419 FPS
ultra	330 FPS	364 FPS

Open Core i5-12400F Open Core i7-12800HX

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Core i7-12800HX

Core i5-12400F

The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Core i7-12800HX

The Core i7-12800HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 May 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-HX (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,229 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i7-12800HX offers 16 cores / 24 threads — the Core i7-12800HX has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 4.8 GHz on the Core i7-12800HX — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-12800HX (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i7-12800HX uses Alder Lake-HX (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Core i7-12800HX's 31,229 — a 46.1% lead for the Core i7-12800HX. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 12,380 vs 18,680 (40.6% advantage for the Core i7-12800HX). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,700 vs 1,962, a 14.3% lead for the Core i7-12800HX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 657 vs 15,000 (183.2% advantage for the Core i7-12800HX). L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 25 MB (total) on the Core i7-12800HX.

Feature	Core i5-12400F	Core i7-12800HX
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	16 / 24+167%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz	4.8 GHz+9%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+25%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	18 MB (total)	25 MB (total)+39%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	1.25 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake-S (2022)	Alder Lake-HX (2022)
PassMark	19,532	31,229+60%
Cinebench R23 Multi	12,380	18,680+51%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,700	1,962+15%
Geekbench 6 Multi	657	15,000+2183%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-12800HX uses FCBGA1964 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F) and HM670,WM690 (Core i7-12800HX).

Feature	Core i5-12400F	Core i7-12800HX
Socket	LGA1700	FCBGA1964
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. The Core i7-12800HX includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Core i5-12400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value, Core i7-12800HX targets Extreme Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600; Core i7-12800HX rivals Ryzen 7 6800HX.

Feature	Core i5-12400F	Core i7-12800HX
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Intel UHD Graphics 770
Unlocked	—	Yes
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Gaming Performance/Value	Extreme Gaming Laptop