Core i5-12400F vs Core i7-13700F

Intel

Core i5-12400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2022
Core family
·······
VS
Intel

Core i7-13700F

16 Cores24 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.2 GHz2023
Core family
·······

Core i5-12400F vs Core i7-13700F Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-12400F vs Core i7-13700F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-12400F vs Core i7-13700F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Why buy it

  • Costs $185 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $359 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (12,380 vs 24,775).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 30 MB).

Core i7-13700F

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +12.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +66.7% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 18 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 106.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $359 MSRPvs$174 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700F better than Core i5-12400F?
Yes. Core i7-13700F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 12.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 100.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 95.6% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i7-13700F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 12.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700F is the stronger fit. You are getting 100.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 66.7% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 18 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-13700F is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-12400F is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i7-13700F comes in 106.3% more expensive on MSRP at $359 MSRP versus $174 MSRP, and it still gives you a 12.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-12400F is also 5.5% better value on MSRP (112.3 vs 106.4 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-13700F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022), 66.7% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 18 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 24 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-12400F vs Core i7-13700F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i5-12400F

The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Intel

Core i7-13700F

The Core i7-13700F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,212 points. Launch price was $359.

Processing Power

The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i7-13700F offers 16 cores / 24 threads — the Core i7-13700F has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-13700F — a 16.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i7-13700F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Core i7-13700F's 38,212 — a 64.7% lead for the Core i7-13700F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 12,380 vs 24,775 (66.7% advantage for the Core i7-13700F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,700 vs 2,676, a 44.6% lead for the Core i7-13700F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 657 vs 14,254 (182.4% advantage for the Core i7-13700F). L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700F.

FeatureCore i5-12400FCore i7-13700F
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
16 / 24+167%
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz
5.2 GHz+18%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz+19%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
18 MB (total)
30 MB (total)+67%
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)+60%
Process
Intel 7 nm
Intel 7 nm
Architecture
Alder Lake-S (2022)
Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark
19,532
38,212+96%
Cinebench R23 Multi
12,380
24,775+100%
Geekbench 6 Single
1,700
2,676+57%
Geekbench 6 Multi
657
14,254+2070%
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 3.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-12400F versus DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200 on the Core i7-13700F — the Core i7-13700F supports 16.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-13700F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i7-13700F).

FeatureCore i5-12400FCore i7-13700F
Socket
LGA1700
LGA1700
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200+17%
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
192 GB+50%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
20
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value, Core i7-13700F targets High-end Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600; Core i7-13700F rivals Ryzen 7 7700X.

FeatureCore i5-12400FCore i7-13700F
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Gaming Performance/Value
High-end Gaming
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-12400F was priced at $174, while the Core i7-13700F came in at $359. On launch pricing ($174 vs $359), Core i5-12400F was $185 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-12400F delivers 112.3 pts/$ vs 106.4 pts/$ for the Core i7-13700F — making the Core i5-12400F the 5.3% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-12400FCore i7-13700F
MSRP
$174-52%
$359
Performance per Dollar
112.3+6%
106.4
Release Date
2022
2023

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.